"I got politics and economics moving, and then others took over"
About this Quote
The subtext is a quiet correction to history as it's often told. Revolutions get nationalized into neat myths, then reassigned to parties, technocrats, and "responsible" statesmen once the hard part is over. Walesa insists on the primacy of disruption: labor pressure and street legitimacy forced politics to respond, and economics to stop pretending scarcity was destiny. The second clause - "and then others took over" - is where the bitterness sneaks in. It reads like a concession and an indictment at once: yes, transitions require administrators, but administrators also inherit glory and rewrite credit.
Context matters because post-1989 Poland quickly became a laboratory for shock therapy, privatization, and new elites, while Walesa himself had a messy, polarizing presidency. The line therefore doubles as self-portrait and critique of democratization: the charismatic catalyst rarely gets to control the aftermath. He frames leadership not as governing forever, but as creating motion and accepting that the moving parts will eventually belong to someone else.
Quote Details
| Topic | Leadership |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Walesa, Lech. (2026, February 17). I got politics and economics moving, and then others took over. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-got-politics-and-economics-moving-and-then-99028/
Chicago Style
Walesa, Lech. "I got politics and economics moving, and then others took over." FixQuotes. February 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-got-politics-and-economics-moving-and-then-99028/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"I got politics and economics moving, and then others took over." FixQuotes, 17 Feb. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-got-politics-and-economics-moving-and-then-99028/. Accessed 22 Feb. 2026.






