"I guess there is also an element of deliberate change involved. Each of my books has been, at least from my point of view, radically different from the last"
About this Quote
Restlessness is being framed here as method, not mood. Murray’s “I guess” looks casual, almost self-effacing, but it slyly lowers the stakes before he makes a bolder claim: the changes aren’t accidental. That little verbal shrug functions like a poet’s version of plausible deniability, a way to admit ambition without sounding programmatic. Then the phrase “element of deliberate change” quietly turns what could be read as inconsistency into craft: reinvention as a chosen discipline.
The second sentence tightens the subtext. “Each of my books has been” is a statement of pattern, not a one-off experiment. It suggests a career built on refusing the safe signature style that publishing and readers often reward. The parenthetical qualifier - “at least from my point of view” - matters. It acknowledges the gap between how artists experience their work (as seismic internal shifts) and how audiences may perceive it (as variations on a brand). That caveat is also a polite preemptive strike against critics: if you don’t see the radical difference, the limitation might be in the viewing angle, not the work.
Contextually, poets are often boxed in by the first book that lands: a tone, a subject, a “voice.” Murray’s line pushes back against that marketplace logic. He’s describing an ethic of self-disruption, where staying recognizable is less important than staying alive to the next risk. The intent isn’t novelty for novelty’s sake; it’s an argument that growth requires rupture, and that the poet’s job includes breaking his own rules before they harden into a cage.
The second sentence tightens the subtext. “Each of my books has been” is a statement of pattern, not a one-off experiment. It suggests a career built on refusing the safe signature style that publishing and readers often reward. The parenthetical qualifier - “at least from my point of view” - matters. It acknowledges the gap between how artists experience their work (as seismic internal shifts) and how audiences may perceive it (as variations on a brand). That caveat is also a polite preemptive strike against critics: if you don’t see the radical difference, the limitation might be in the viewing angle, not the work.
Contextually, poets are often boxed in by the first book that lands: a tone, a subject, a “voice.” Murray’s line pushes back against that marketplace logic. He’s describing an ethic of self-disruption, where staying recognizable is less important than staying alive to the next risk. The intent isn’t novelty for novelty’s sake; it’s an argument that growth requires rupture, and that the poet’s job includes breaking his own rules before they harden into a cage.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reinvention |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by George
Add to List


