"I had an almost fetishistic attraction to film technology"
About this Quote
The subtext is a quiet argument against the romantic myth of the filmmaker as pure storyteller. Von Trier positions himself closer to the engineer-pervert hybrid: someone who gets off on the mechanics of control, on how lenses, stocks, and workflows shape what an audience is allowed to feel. That’s why the line lands. It’s both disarming and a little disturbing, a wink that says: don’t mistake my themes for my methods. The method is the point.
Context matters here: von Trier emerges from a European art-cinema lineage that treats form as ideology, then helps formalize Dogme 95, a movement that pretends to reject technological seduction while actually obsessing over it through negation. Even his later pivots into digital, heavy stylization, and theatrical artificiality read as different expressions of the same fixation. He’s telling you the “why” behind the aesthetic whiplash: the technology isn’t merely how the film gets made; it’s where his appetite lives.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite | Cite this Quote |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Trier, Lars von. (n.d.). I had an almost fetishistic attraction to film technology. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-had-an-almost-fetishistic-attraction-to-film-131260/
Chicago Style
Trier, Lars von. "I had an almost fetishistic attraction to film technology." FixQuotes. Accessed February 2, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-had-an-almost-fetishistic-attraction-to-film-131260/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"I had an almost fetishistic attraction to film technology." FixQuotes, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-had-an-almost-fetishistic-attraction-to-film-131260/. Accessed 2 Feb. 2026.




