"I had done a lot of rock 'n' roll photography when I was in college. I was one of many photographers who worked for The Doors, Jefferson Airplane, and all of these rock 'n' roll bands"
About this Quote
The flex here is quiet, almost accidental: a scientist casually dropping that he once shot photos for The Doors and Jefferson Airplane, as if it were just another lab rotation. That understatement is the point. John Dykstra isn’t selling a glamorous origin story so much as smuggling in an argument about permeability: between disciplines, between “serious” work and youthful immersion, between technical craft and cultural chaos.
His phrasing does two things at once. “I had done a lot” sounds modest, but it also signals fluency. He wasn’t dabbling; he was inside a scene that, in hindsight, reads like a museum exhibit of 1960s America. Then he immediately trims his own importance: “I was one of many photographers.” That deflation matters. It resists the myth of singular genius, the same myth that tends to haunt both rock history and science history. He positions himself as a working contributor in a larger machine - the band ecosystem on one side, the research ecosystem on the other.
Contextually, the quote nudges at a familiar American trajectory: the college years as a staging ground where identities aren’t fixed yet. Rock photography isn’t just about aesthetics; it’s logistics, access, timing, and technology under pressure. The subtext is that the habits prized in science - attention, calibration, patience, the ability to capture fleeting data before it disappears - were already being practiced in a different key, under stage lights instead of fluorescents.
It’s also a reminder that cultural proximity to history often feels ordinary while you’re living it. That’s what makes the line land: the legend is in the nouns, but the worldview is in the shrug.
His phrasing does two things at once. “I had done a lot” sounds modest, but it also signals fluency. He wasn’t dabbling; he was inside a scene that, in hindsight, reads like a museum exhibit of 1960s America. Then he immediately trims his own importance: “I was one of many photographers.” That deflation matters. It resists the myth of singular genius, the same myth that tends to haunt both rock history and science history. He positions himself as a working contributor in a larger machine - the band ecosystem on one side, the research ecosystem on the other.
Contextually, the quote nudges at a familiar American trajectory: the college years as a staging ground where identities aren’t fixed yet. Rock photography isn’t just about aesthetics; it’s logistics, access, timing, and technology under pressure. The subtext is that the habits prized in science - attention, calibration, patience, the ability to capture fleeting data before it disappears - were already being practiced in a different key, under stage lights instead of fluorescents.
It’s also a reminder that cultural proximity to history often feels ordinary while you’re living it. That’s what makes the line land: the legend is in the nouns, but the worldview is in the shrug.
Quote Details
| Topic | Music |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by John
Add to List


