"I had found again and again that the most aberrant population of a species - often having reached species rank, and occasionally classified even as a separate genus - occurred at a peripheral location, indeed usually at the most isolated peripheral location"
About this Quote
Evolution, in Mayr's telling, doesn’t politely unfold in the middle of the map. It gets weird at the edges. This line is doing more than reporting a naturalist’s observation; it’s an argument for where novelty comes from, and it’s pitched with the quiet confidence of someone who’s spent a lifetime watching taxonomy misbehave in the field.
Mayr is pointing to a recurring pattern: the most striking variants of a species show up in small, isolated, peripheral populations. The “aberrant” here isn’t an insult so much as a diagnostic label: forms that look off-script enough to tempt scientists into upgrading them to a new species, even a new genus. That escalation matters. He’s hinting at how our categories can be seduced by extremes, and how isolation can manufacture extremes fast.
The subtext is Mayr’s signature worldview: speciation is not just gradual change everywhere, but often a geographically staged event. Peripheral isolates get cut off from gene flow, shoved into different ecological pressures, and forced through genetic bottlenecks. The result is a population that doesn’t just drift; it diverges in visible, classifier-baiting ways.
Contextually, this sits inside mid-20th-century evolutionary biology as Mayr helped build the Modern Synthesis and championed allopatric speciation (especially peripatric speciation). It’s also a corrective to armchair evolution: you don’t infer the engine of biodiversity from average specimens. You go to the margins, where the rulebook is thinnest and the exceptions start to look like new rules.
Mayr is pointing to a recurring pattern: the most striking variants of a species show up in small, isolated, peripheral populations. The “aberrant” here isn’t an insult so much as a diagnostic label: forms that look off-script enough to tempt scientists into upgrading them to a new species, even a new genus. That escalation matters. He’s hinting at how our categories can be seduced by extremes, and how isolation can manufacture extremes fast.
The subtext is Mayr’s signature worldview: speciation is not just gradual change everywhere, but often a geographically staged event. Peripheral isolates get cut off from gene flow, shoved into different ecological pressures, and forced through genetic bottlenecks. The result is a population that doesn’t just drift; it diverges in visible, classifier-baiting ways.
Contextually, this sits inside mid-20th-century evolutionary biology as Mayr helped build the Modern Synthesis and championed allopatric speciation (especially peripatric speciation). It’s also a corrective to armchair evolution: you don’t infer the engine of biodiversity from average specimens. You go to the margins, where the rulebook is thinnest and the exceptions start to look like new rules.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Systematics and the Origin of Species (from the Viewpoint of a Zoologist), Ernst Mayr, 1942 — passage discussing peripheral isolates/peripatric speciation (commonly cited source for this line). |
More Quotes by Ernst
Add to List
