"I had no idea that I would ever get involved with something like lending money to poor people, given the circumstances in which I was working in Bangladesh"
About this Quote
There’s a quiet sleight of hand in Yunus’s admission: he frames microcredit not as a grand ideological mission but as an almost accidental collision between theory and lived reality. The line “I had no idea” lowers the temperature on purpose, positioning him less as savior than as someone startled into responsibility. For a Bangladeshi economist, especially in the post-independence decades marked by famine, political volatility, and aid-saturated development schemes, that modesty is strategic. It signals a break from the era’s technocratic confidence, when economists could still pretend that elegant models were a substitute for proximity.
The phrase “given the circumstances in which I was working in Bangladesh” does double duty. On the surface, it’s a logistical note: he was on the ground, close enough to see the mechanics of poverty. Underneath, it’s an indictment of professional distance. He’s implying that the normal posture of his field makes “lending money to poor people” seem unthinkable until the context forces the question. The subtext is that poverty isn’t primarily a moral failure or a cultural deficit; it’s an access problem, policed by institutions that treat the poor as unbankable by default.
What makes the quote work is its understated pivot from abstraction to the smallest unit of change: a loan. Not revolution, not charity, not a five-year plan. Just cash and trust. In Yunus’s telling, that pivot isn’t utopian; it’s pragmatic, almost embarrassed. That tone helped microcredit travel globally: it sounds like common sense discovered late, which is often the most persuasive kind of reform.
The phrase “given the circumstances in which I was working in Bangladesh” does double duty. On the surface, it’s a logistical note: he was on the ground, close enough to see the mechanics of poverty. Underneath, it’s an indictment of professional distance. He’s implying that the normal posture of his field makes “lending money to poor people” seem unthinkable until the context forces the question. The subtext is that poverty isn’t primarily a moral failure or a cultural deficit; it’s an access problem, policed by institutions that treat the poor as unbankable by default.
What makes the quote work is its understated pivot from abstraction to the smallest unit of change: a loan. Not revolution, not charity, not a five-year plan. Just cash and trust. In Yunus’s telling, that pivot isn’t utopian; it’s pragmatic, almost embarrassed. That tone helped microcredit travel globally: it sounds like common sense discovered late, which is often the most persuasive kind of reform.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|
More Quotes by Muhammad
Add to List




