"I hate a word like "pets": it sounds so much like something with no living of its own"
About this Quote
That sensitivity tracks with Jennings's broader poetic temperament, which often fixes on the ordinary (a room, a relationship, a habit) and exposes the pressure it exerts. Her intent isn't to scold pet-owners; it's to catch language in the act of domesticating reality. The subtext is feminist-adjacent without being slogan-y: naming can be a form of control, especially when it makes dependency sound like love. "Pets" is kin to other softening terms that turn uneven power into sentiment.
Context matters: Jennings wrote in a Britain where companion animals were increasingly folded into middle-class domestic identity, and where the rhetoric of "keeping" and "owning" sat comfortably beside genuine attachment. She doesn’t deny the attachment. She distrusts the vocabulary that congratulates us for it. The line works because it weaponizes a small aesthetic irritation into an ethical insight: tenderness can still be a cage, and language is often the lock.
Quote Details
| Topic | Pet Love |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Jennings, Elizabeth. (2026, February 16). I hate a word like "pets": it sounds so much like something with no living of its own. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-hate-a-word-like-pets-it-sounds-so-much-like-158181/
Chicago Style
Jennings, Elizabeth. "I hate a word like "pets": it sounds so much like something with no living of its own." FixQuotes. February 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-hate-a-word-like-pets-it-sounds-so-much-like-158181/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"I hate a word like "pets": it sounds so much like something with no living of its own." FixQuotes, 16 Feb. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-hate-a-word-like-pets-it-sounds-so-much-like-158181/. Accessed 19 Feb. 2026.







