"I hate everything which is not in myself"
About this Quote
A flare of egotism and a provocation, the sentence declares a refusal to grant the world any authority unless it can be absorbed, translated, or mastered by the self. Hatred here is not petty dislike but a metaphysical stance: the alien, the unassimilated, the outside, all feel like threats. It captures the artist’s hunger to turn life into inner material, to metabolize experience so that nothing stands beyond the reach of one’s consciousness and style. There is a sinister edge too, because the self that insists on total incorporation risks becoming incapable of real encounter with otherness; it loves only what it can mirror, and therefore treats difference as an insult.
The line also performs an irony Mailer understood well. To confess such voracious self-regard is both honest and theatrical. He cultivated a persona of combative independence, swaggering masculinity, and intellectual bravado, and he often exposed that persona to scrutiny. In the postwar United States, with its pressures toward conformity and suburban placidity, he argued for an existential intensity he associated with risk, transgression, and the artist’s prerogative to live on the edge. The statement reads like a dare to the culture and a dare to himself: if the world will not enter me, I will declare war on it.
Mailer’s nonfiction and novels repeatedly turn experience into self-advertisement and self-examination, making his own ego both engine and target. The desire to own reality by making it interior becomes, in his hands, both creative method and moral hazard. It speaks to a particularly American strain of individualism that confuses authenticity with domination and freedom with refusal of limits. Read one way, the sentence diagnoses the artist’s necessary ruthlessness; read another, it reveals the pathology that can hollow out empathy. Its tension is the point: the self must be large enough to contain the world, yet porous enough to be changed by it.
The line also performs an irony Mailer understood well. To confess such voracious self-regard is both honest and theatrical. He cultivated a persona of combative independence, swaggering masculinity, and intellectual bravado, and he often exposed that persona to scrutiny. In the postwar United States, with its pressures toward conformity and suburban placidity, he argued for an existential intensity he associated with risk, transgression, and the artist’s prerogative to live on the edge. The statement reads like a dare to the culture and a dare to himself: if the world will not enter me, I will declare war on it.
Mailer’s nonfiction and novels repeatedly turn experience into self-advertisement and self-examination, making his own ego both engine and target. The desire to own reality by making it interior becomes, in his hands, both creative method and moral hazard. It speaks to a particularly American strain of individualism that confuses authenticity with domination and freedom with refusal of limits. Read one way, the sentence diagnoses the artist’s necessary ruthlessness; read another, it reveals the pathology that can hollow out empathy. Its tension is the point: the self must be large enough to contain the world, yet porous enough to be changed by it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|
More Quotes by Norman
Add to List










