"I hate liberality - nine times out of ten it is cowardice, and the tenth time lack of principle"
About this Quote
“Hate” is doing deliberate work here: Addington isn’t offering a temperate objection to generosity so much as trying to shame a governing style. As a British statesman in an era of revolutionary aftershocks and hard partisan lines, he treats “liberality” less as charity than as political permissiveness - the habit of yielding, conceding, or staying vague when firmness is demanded. The word carries a double charge: it can mean humane open-handedness, but also laxness, the softening of discipline, the refusal to draw boundaries. Addington wants the second meaning to swallow the first.
The structure is prosecutorial. “Nine times out of ten” pretends to be empirical while functioning as rhetoric: it gives prejudice the costume of statistics. He draws a tight binary: if you’re being liberal, you’re either afraid (cowardice) or unmoored (lack of principle). That’s not analysis; it’s an attempt to make moderation socially expensive. The target is the respectable middle - the politician who compromises not from conviction but from risk management, who uses “tolerance” as a cover for avoiding a fight.
The subtext is anxious governance. In a period when “principle” often meant loyalty to crown, church, and property, “liberality” could look like flirting with instability. Addington’s line is meant to stiffen spines: it recasts flexibility as moral failure, and dares opponents to defend their concessions without the shelter of good intentions. It’s effective because it weaponizes character - not policy - and makes the appearance of courage the first requirement of leadership.
The structure is prosecutorial. “Nine times out of ten” pretends to be empirical while functioning as rhetoric: it gives prejudice the costume of statistics. He draws a tight binary: if you’re being liberal, you’re either afraid (cowardice) or unmoored (lack of principle). That’s not analysis; it’s an attempt to make moderation socially expensive. The target is the respectable middle - the politician who compromises not from conviction but from risk management, who uses “tolerance” as a cover for avoiding a fight.
The subtext is anxious governance. In a period when “principle” often meant loyalty to crown, church, and property, “liberality” could look like flirting with instability. Addington’s line is meant to stiffen spines: it recasts flexibility as moral failure, and dares opponents to defend their concessions without the shelter of good intentions. It’s effective because it weaponizes character - not policy - and makes the appearance of courage the first requirement of leadership.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Henry
Add to List




