"I hate to say it but I think it has become very obvious that our system for devising trade agreements, so very important to this country's functioning around the world, has not only broken, but it has broken completely"
About this Quote
A politician saying a system is "broken" is common; saying it has "broken completely" is a deliberate escalation. Becerra’s line is built to do two things at once: diagnose failure and pre-authorize extraordinary intervention. The phrase "I hate to say it" performs reluctance, signaling he’s not chasing headlines or picking a fight for sport. It’s a credibility move, a pre-emptive defense against the inevitable accusation of partisanship. He frames the claim as reluctant truth-telling, not rhetoric.
The key subtext sits inside the carefully staged scope: this isn’t just bureaucratic dysfunction, it’s a failure in something "so very important to this country's functioning around the world". Trade agreements are cast as infrastructure for global legitimacy, not mere economics. That framing widens the audience beyond wonks and lobbyists, recruiting ordinary anxieties about status, jobs, and geopolitical drift into a single, digestible verdict: the process is unusable.
"System for devising" matters too. He’s not attacking a specific treaty or outcome; he’s indicting the machinery that produces them. That’s a tactical choice, because it invites reform without requiring agreement on any particular trade ideology. In Washington terms, it’s an opening bid for procedural overhaul (authority, transparency, speed, enforcement), while also assigning blame to a diffuse "system" rather than naming enemies. The quote works because it converts a complex policy bottleneck into a moralized crisis of competence, setting the stage for whoever promises to rebuild the machine.
The key subtext sits inside the carefully staged scope: this isn’t just bureaucratic dysfunction, it’s a failure in something "so very important to this country's functioning around the world". Trade agreements are cast as infrastructure for global legitimacy, not mere economics. That framing widens the audience beyond wonks and lobbyists, recruiting ordinary anxieties about status, jobs, and geopolitical drift into a single, digestible verdict: the process is unusable.
"System for devising" matters too. He’s not attacking a specific treaty or outcome; he’s indicting the machinery that produces them. That’s a tactical choice, because it invites reform without requiring agreement on any particular trade ideology. In Washington terms, it’s an opening bid for procedural overhaul (authority, transparency, speed, enforcement), while also assigning blame to a diffuse "system" rather than naming enemies. The quote works because it converts a complex policy bottleneck into a moralized crisis of competence, setting the stage for whoever promises to rebuild the machine.
Quote Details
| Topic | Decision-Making |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Xavier
Add to List

