"I have also been saddened, though hardly surprised, by the weakness of the EU's reaction to the criminal attack on the Danish embassy in Syria, which seems to have been permitted, if not actively encouraged, by the Syrian regime"
About this Quote
Saddened but hardly surprised is the tell: Timothy Garton Ash isn’t merely reporting disappointment, he’s diagnosing a political reflex. The EU, in his framing, defaults to procedural caution even when its own diplomatic norms are violated. The line works because it braids emotion with expectation: sadness signals a stake in Europe as a moral actor, while “hardly surprised” punctures any illusion that outrage will translate into consequence.
The real charge sits in the syntax around responsibility. “Weakness” isn’t just timidity; it implies a failure of identity, an institution that talks like a power but behaves like a committee. Then comes the scalpel: the attack “seems to have been permitted, if not actively encouraged.” That conditional escalation matters. Ash uses the language of inference, not allegation, to stay inside the bounds of careful public argument while still pointing at state complicity. It’s a classic liberal-intellectual maneuver: meticulous on evidentiary posture, ruthless on moral implication.
Contextually, he’s writing into an era when European diplomacy often sought “dialogue” with authoritarian regimes, hoping economic ties and multilateral process could temper brutality. By invoking the Danish embassy, he narrows the issue from abstract human rights to the tangible violation of sovereign space - a test case designed to expose European hesitation. The subtext is blunt: if the EU cannot defend even the basic rules that protect its own representatives, its claims to be a principled global actor read less like policy and more like branding.
The real charge sits in the syntax around responsibility. “Weakness” isn’t just timidity; it implies a failure of identity, an institution that talks like a power but behaves like a committee. Then comes the scalpel: the attack “seems to have been permitted, if not actively encouraged.” That conditional escalation matters. Ash uses the language of inference, not allegation, to stay inside the bounds of careful public argument while still pointing at state complicity. It’s a classic liberal-intellectual maneuver: meticulous on evidentiary posture, ruthless on moral implication.
Contextually, he’s writing into an era when European diplomacy often sought “dialogue” with authoritarian regimes, hoping economic ties and multilateral process could temper brutality. By invoking the Danish embassy, he narrows the issue from abstract human rights to the tangible violation of sovereign space - a test case designed to expose European hesitation. The subtext is blunt: if the EU cannot defend even the basic rules that protect its own representatives, its claims to be a principled global actor read less like policy and more like branding.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Timothy
Add to List
