"I have always advocated for funding and programs that increase our productivity and competitiveness"
About this Quote
It sounds like a policy statement, but it’s really a self-portrait: a politician positioning himself as the adult in the room, the guy who speaks fluent spreadsheet. “Always advocated” is the tell. It’s not evidence; it’s branding. By framing his record as continuous and consistent, Allen is asking voters to trust his disposition more than any particular bill or outcome.
The phrase “funding and programs” does double duty. “Funding” signals seriousness and the willingness to spend; “programs” signals structure and accountability. Together, they imply competence without naming a price tag or a tradeoff. That vagueness isn’t a flaw, it’s the point: it invites business leaders, suburban moderates, and budget hawks to hear what they want. If you’re pro-growth, “funding” can mean investment. If you’re anti-bureaucracy, “programs” can mean targeted efficiency. The sentence keeps the coalition intact by refusing to specify winners and losers.
“Productivity and competitiveness” is classic post-Cold War economic rhetoric, the language of globalization, anxieties about jobs leaving, and the promise that the right policy tweaks can keep America “ahead.” It smuggles in a value system: economic performance as the primary measure of public success. There’s no mention of inequality, labor power, environmental cost, or who benefits when “productivity” rises. The subtext is that growth is neutral and broadly shared, and the political intent is to claim the moral high ground of pragmatism while sidestepping the messy question of for whom the economy is being made competitive.
The phrase “funding and programs” does double duty. “Funding” signals seriousness and the willingness to spend; “programs” signals structure and accountability. Together, they imply competence without naming a price tag or a tradeoff. That vagueness isn’t a flaw, it’s the point: it invites business leaders, suburban moderates, and budget hawks to hear what they want. If you’re pro-growth, “funding” can mean investment. If you’re anti-bureaucracy, “programs” can mean targeted efficiency. The sentence keeps the coalition intact by refusing to specify winners and losers.
“Productivity and competitiveness” is classic post-Cold War economic rhetoric, the language of globalization, anxieties about jobs leaving, and the promise that the right policy tweaks can keep America “ahead.” It smuggles in a value system: economic performance as the primary measure of public success. There’s no mention of inequality, labor power, environmental cost, or who benefits when “productivity” rises. The subtext is that growth is neutral and broadly shared, and the political intent is to claim the moral high ground of pragmatism while sidestepping the messy question of for whom the economy is being made competitive.
Quote Details
| Topic | Vision & Strategy |
|---|
More Quotes by George
Add to List
