"I have been defending Israel's right to exist, and to defend itself against terrorism, for many years-on college campuses, in television appearances and in debate"
About this Quote
There is a lawyerly move baked into Dershowitz's phrasing: he doesn’t argue a policy so much as pre-load a legitimacy claim. “Israel’s right to exist” and “to defend itself” are presented as axioms, not propositions, making dissent feel less like disagreement and more like moral or civic delinquency. It’s a rhetorical shortcut with real force in American discourse, where “right to exist” often functions as a loyalty test, and “defend itself” can quietly absorb everything from narrowly targeted security actions to far broader campaigns.
The subtext is credentialing. “For many years” signals seniority; “on college campuses, in television appearances and in debate” maps a career spent winning public arguments in the places where narratives get manufactured: universities (moral authority and youth politics), TV (mass persuasion), debate (the sport of logic). He’s not just pro-Israel; he’s a veteran of the culture war around Israel, implying he’s already survived the cross-examinations. That’s a preemptive shield against critics who might paint him as opportunistic or one-sided.
“Terrorism” does heavy lifting, too. It narrows the frame to the most universally condemned adversary, smoothing over messy distinctions between militants and civilians, or between counterterrorism and collective punishment. The intent is to anchor Israel’s actions in the post-1970s and post-9/11 moral vocabulary of self-defense, where the burden shifts: opponents must prove not just that a policy is wrong, but that the very premise of defense is illegitimate. In one sentence, Dershowitz positions himself as both witness and advocate, turning geopolitics into a courtroom where he controls the opening statement.
The subtext is credentialing. “For many years” signals seniority; “on college campuses, in television appearances and in debate” maps a career spent winning public arguments in the places where narratives get manufactured: universities (moral authority and youth politics), TV (mass persuasion), debate (the sport of logic). He’s not just pro-Israel; he’s a veteran of the culture war around Israel, implying he’s already survived the cross-examinations. That’s a preemptive shield against critics who might paint him as opportunistic or one-sided.
“Terrorism” does heavy lifting, too. It narrows the frame to the most universally condemned adversary, smoothing over messy distinctions between militants and civilians, or between counterterrorism and collective punishment. The intent is to anchor Israel’s actions in the post-1970s and post-9/11 moral vocabulary of self-defense, where the burden shifts: opponents must prove not just that a policy is wrong, but that the very premise of defense is illegitimate. In one sentence, Dershowitz positions himself as both witness and advocate, turning geopolitics into a courtroom where he controls the opening statement.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Alan
Add to List
