"I have learnt that I am me, that I can do the things that, as one might put it, me can do, but I cannot do the things that me would like to do"
About this Quote
Chambers pins down a spiritual truth with the bluntness of a man trying to talk himself out of self-deception. The phrasing is almost awkward on purpose: "I am me" lands like a forced confession, not a motivational slogan. Then he doubles down with that strange grammatical pivot - "me can do" versus "me would like to do" - turning the self into an object you have to manage rather than a heroic agent you can endlessly expand. The intent is restraint: to name the limits of personality, temperament, and moral capacity without dressing them up as quirks or destiny.
The subtext is a critique of wishful selfhood. Chambers is suspicious of the gap between aspiration and ability because that gap is where pride breeds. "Would like" is the tell: desire becomes its own alibi, a way to feel righteous about what you haven't actually done. By contrast, "can do" points to the sober inventory of what obedience, discipline, or grace might realistically make possible. It's not anti-ambition; it's anti-fantasy.
Context matters. Writing in the early 20th century, amid a rising culture of self-improvement and individual willpower, Chambers (best known for My Utmost for His Highest, published posthumously) frames identity less as self-expression and more as self-surrender. The line reads like a devotional check on modern autonomy: you are not infinitely malleable, and pretending otherwise isn't liberation. It's a quieter, more severe mercy - accept the actual "me" so you can stop worshipping the imaginary one.
The subtext is a critique of wishful selfhood. Chambers is suspicious of the gap between aspiration and ability because that gap is where pride breeds. "Would like" is the tell: desire becomes its own alibi, a way to feel righteous about what you haven't actually done. By contrast, "can do" points to the sober inventory of what obedience, discipline, or grace might realistically make possible. It's not anti-ambition; it's anti-fantasy.
Context matters. Writing in the early 20th century, amid a rising culture of self-improvement and individual willpower, Chambers (best known for My Utmost for His Highest, published posthumously) frames identity less as self-expression and more as self-surrender. The line reads like a devotional check on modern autonomy: you are not infinitely malleable, and pretending otherwise isn't liberation. It's a quieter, more severe mercy - accept the actual "me" so you can stop worshipping the imaginary one.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Oswald
Add to List
