"I have never believed in comparisons, whether they are about different eras, players or coaches"
About this Quote
Tendulkar’s refusal to “believe in comparisons” reads like a gentle line with a hard edge. In a sports culture addicted to ranking - GOAT debates, era-adjusted stats, endless hot takes - he’s drawing a boundary around what competition is supposed to measure, and what it can’t. The intent isn’t to dodge scrutiny; it’s to reject a kind of lazy certainty. Comparisons promise clarity, but they often flatten the messy variables that actually shape greatness: pitches and equipment, rule changes, travel schedules, the size of the spotlight, even the psychological burden of being a nation’s weekly referendum.
The subtext is protective in two directions. It protects his peers and successors from being treated as supporting characters in someone else’s legend. It also protects his own legacy from the indignity of being reduced to an argument on television. Coming from Tendulkar - arguably the most compared cricketer alive - the stance carries credibility because it costs him something: comparisons usually benefit the already-mythologized.
Context matters, too. Indian cricket has long been a factory for icons, and icons become units of measurement. Fans don’t just watch; they litigate. Tendulkar’s line quietly refuses that courtroom. It suggests that sport’s deepest value isn’t settling historical cases, but witnessing excellence in real time, within its conditions. He’s not saying all evaluation is pointless; he’s saying reverence should not require subtraction. In a world that treats every new star as a threat to an old one, it’s an unusually generous philosophy.
The subtext is protective in two directions. It protects his peers and successors from being treated as supporting characters in someone else’s legend. It also protects his own legacy from the indignity of being reduced to an argument on television. Coming from Tendulkar - arguably the most compared cricketer alive - the stance carries credibility because it costs him something: comparisons usually benefit the already-mythologized.
Context matters, too. Indian cricket has long been a factory for icons, and icons become units of measurement. Fans don’t just watch; they litigate. Tendulkar’s line quietly refuses that courtroom. It suggests that sport’s deepest value isn’t settling historical cases, but witnessing excellence in real time, within its conditions. He’s not saying all evaluation is pointless; he’s saying reverence should not require subtraction. In a world that treats every new star as a threat to an old one, it’s an unusually generous philosophy.
Quote Details
| Topic | Sports |
|---|
More Quotes by Sachin
Add to List



