"I have newspapers coming to me and saying, 'Can we get in on the TARP?'"
About this Quote
Even in nine words, Pelosi manages to stage a little morality play about the bailout era: the cash spigot is so indiscriminate that even the watchdogs want a taste. Dropping the line in the middle of the 2008-09 TARP frenzy, she’s not just cracking wise about the press; she’s indicting the atmosphere that made moral hazard feel like the new normal. The joke lands because it relies on role reversal. Newspapers are supposed to interrogate power, not line up at Treasury’s window with everyone else. Put them in the same queue as banks and automakers and the whole bailout begins to look less like emergency surgery and more like a feeding system.
The phrasing is doing quiet political work. “I have newspapers coming to me” casts Pelosi as the corridor through which desperation flows, a gatekeeper being approached by yet another constituency. “Can we get in on the TARP?” mimics the language of access and insider advantage: not “Do we qualify?” or “Is there a program?” but “Can we get in,” as if the bailout were a club with a velvet rope. She’s also sharpening a broader message: in a crisis, even institutions that posture as independent become lobbying actors with their hand out.
There’s a second edge. Newspapers in 2009 were collapsing under the combined weight of the recession and the internet’s ad apocalypse. Pelosi’s quip lets her acknowledge that pain while keeping her distance from it. Compassion, yes; legitimacy, debatable. The line is funny because it’s bleak, and it’s bleak because it’s accurate.
The phrasing is doing quiet political work. “I have newspapers coming to me” casts Pelosi as the corridor through which desperation flows, a gatekeeper being approached by yet another constituency. “Can we get in on the TARP?” mimics the language of access and insider advantage: not “Do we qualify?” or “Is there a program?” but “Can we get in,” as if the bailout were a club with a velvet rope. She’s also sharpening a broader message: in a crisis, even institutions that posture as independent become lobbying actors with their hand out.
There’s a second edge. Newspapers in 2009 were collapsing under the combined weight of the recession and the internet’s ad apocalypse. Pelosi’s quip lets her acknowledge that pain while keeping her distance from it. Compassion, yes; legitimacy, debatable. The line is funny because it’s bleak, and it’s bleak because it’s accurate.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Nancy
Add to List









