"I have no desire to take all black people back to Africa; there are blacks who are no good here and will likewise be no good there"
About this Quote
Garvey isn’t daydreaming about a mass exodus here; he’s drawing a brutal boundary around what his movement is and isn’t. In the most jarring clause - "there are blacks who are no good here" - he refuses the easy romance of racial unity by blood alone. The line functions like a purge disguised as pragmatism: back-to-Africa rhetoric was often caricatured by critics as fanciful or extremist, so Garvey counters with a colder claim of selectivity. He wants discipline, reputation, and political seriousness, not a symbolic pilgrimage that ships America’s problems overseas.
The subtext is respectability politics with teeth. "No good here" is a moral verdict, not a socioeconomic one, and it assumes Black liberation requires internal policing: the community must prove it can govern itself by sorting the worthy from the "unworthy". That’s strategic, but it’s also dangerous - it echoes the very logic used to justify exclusion and punishment in the first place. Garvey is building a nationalist project that needs legitimacy, capital, and international recognition; that kind of project tends to get allergic to anything that looks like disorder.
Context matters: in the 1910s and 1920s, amid white supremacist violence, restricted opportunity, and the Great Migration, Garvey’s UNIA pitched Black self-determination as an alternative to integrationist appeals. This quote reveals the movement’s internal contradiction: liberation framed as collective destiny, but enforced through individual moral triage. It’s a statement meant to reassure skeptics and intimidate waverers - a promise that Black nationalism won’t be a refuge for society’s castoffs, even if those castoffs were made by society.
The subtext is respectability politics with teeth. "No good here" is a moral verdict, not a socioeconomic one, and it assumes Black liberation requires internal policing: the community must prove it can govern itself by sorting the worthy from the "unworthy". That’s strategic, but it’s also dangerous - it echoes the very logic used to justify exclusion and punishment in the first place. Garvey is building a nationalist project that needs legitimacy, capital, and international recognition; that kind of project tends to get allergic to anything that looks like disorder.
Context matters: in the 1910s and 1920s, amid white supremacist violence, restricted opportunity, and the Great Migration, Garvey’s UNIA pitched Black self-determination as an alternative to integrationist appeals. This quote reveals the movement’s internal contradiction: liberation framed as collective destiny, but enforced through individual moral triage. It’s a statement meant to reassure skeptics and intimidate waverers - a promise that Black nationalism won’t be a refuge for society’s castoffs, even if those castoffs were made by society.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Marcus
Add to List




