"I have nothing to do with counting the votes"
About this Quote
A democracy’s dirtiest work is always framed as clerical. Kenneth Blackwell’s line - “I have nothing to do with counting the votes” - is a masterpiece of bureaucratic self-exoneration, the kind that turns a crisis of legitimacy into a matter of job descriptions. It’s not a grand defense of principle; it’s a procedural alibi.
Blackwell, as Ohio’s secretary of state during the 2004 election, sat in a role that was both umpire and political actor. The context matters because his office oversaw rules, access, and certification in an election decided on razor margins, under national scrutiny, with accusations of voter suppression and partisan administration swirling. So when he says he has “nothing to do” with counting, he’s trying to narrow the frame: don’t look at the system, look only at the most literal, most photogenic act of tallying.
The subtext is an argument about responsibility. Counting votes is the visible endpoint; power lives upstream, in decisions about machines, precinct resources, provisional ballots, ID requirements, purges, and which errors get treated as innocent versus disqualifying. “Nothing to do” is doing a lot of work: it invites the public to imagine elections as neutral math rather than contested governance.
It’s also a political tell. If you’re confident in an election’s integrity, you don’t reach for a technicality; you lean into transparency. This line doesn’t deny influence. It denies culpability, swapping trust for semantics at the exact moment voters are asking who, exactly, is accountable.
Blackwell, as Ohio’s secretary of state during the 2004 election, sat in a role that was both umpire and political actor. The context matters because his office oversaw rules, access, and certification in an election decided on razor margins, under national scrutiny, with accusations of voter suppression and partisan administration swirling. So when he says he has “nothing to do” with counting, he’s trying to narrow the frame: don’t look at the system, look only at the most literal, most photogenic act of tallying.
The subtext is an argument about responsibility. Counting votes is the visible endpoint; power lives upstream, in decisions about machines, precinct resources, provisional ballots, ID requirements, purges, and which errors get treated as innocent versus disqualifying. “Nothing to do” is doing a lot of work: it invites the public to imagine elections as neutral math rather than contested governance.
It’s also a political tell. If you’re confident in an election’s integrity, you don’t reach for a technicality; you lean into transparency. This line doesn’t deny influence. It denies culpability, swapping trust for semantics at the exact moment voters are asking who, exactly, is accountable.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Kenneth
Add to List







