"I have often thought that if a rational Fascist dictatorship were to exist, then it would choose the American system"
About this Quote
Chomsky’s jab lands because it violates a comforting binary: fascism over there, democracy over here. By dangling the phrase “rational Fascist dictatorship,” he performs a kind of rhetorical judo. “Rational” isn’t praise; it’s a warning that modern authoritarianism doesn’t need jackboots or mass rallies. It can run on paperwork, PR, and well-designed institutions that produce consent while preserving the aesthetic of choice.
The sting is in “would choose the American system.” Chomsky isn’t claiming the U.S. is fascist in the classical sense; he’s pointing to a system that can deliver many of the same outcomes an authoritarian elite would want: disciplined labor, predictable foreign policy, and a public sphere where the range of “serious” debate stays safely inside pro-business, pro-empire guardrails. The genius of the line is that it flatters America’s self-image (stable, orderly, lawful) while implying those very virtues can be repurposed as instruments of control. A dictatorship doesn’t have to abolish elections if it can make them low-stakes, market-funded, and structurally insulated from disruptive popular demands.
Context matters: Chomsky is writing and speaking in the long shadow of Cold War anti-communism, U.S. interventions abroad, and the rise of corporate media. His broader project argues that power prefers legitimacy to brute force. The subtext is bleakly pragmatic: if you want domination without the messy optics of repression, you don’t tear down liberal democracy. You capture it.
The sting is in “would choose the American system.” Chomsky isn’t claiming the U.S. is fascist in the classical sense; he’s pointing to a system that can deliver many of the same outcomes an authoritarian elite would want: disciplined labor, predictable foreign policy, and a public sphere where the range of “serious” debate stays safely inside pro-business, pro-empire guardrails. The genius of the line is that it flatters America’s self-image (stable, orderly, lawful) while implying those very virtues can be repurposed as instruments of control. A dictatorship doesn’t have to abolish elections if it can make them low-stakes, market-funded, and structurally insulated from disruptive popular demands.
Context matters: Chomsky is writing and speaking in the long shadow of Cold War anti-communism, U.S. interventions abroad, and the rise of corporate media. His broader project argues that power prefers legitimacy to brute force. The subtext is bleakly pragmatic: if you want domination without the messy optics of repression, you don’t tear down liberal democracy. You capture it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Noam
Add to List



