"I have seen too much not to know that the impression of a woman may be more valuable than the conclusion of an analytical reasoner"
About this Quote
Doyle slips a quiet heresy into a sentence that sounds almost like Victorian courtesy: the idea that “impression” can outrank “analytical” conclusion. Coming from the creator of Sherlock Holmes, that’s not an accident; it’s a corrective. The Holmes canon sells us on deduction as a near-religious practice, but Doyle repeatedly undercuts pure rationalism with the messy data of lived experience: motives, atmospheres, tells that aren’t easily itemized. “I have seen too much” is doing the heavy lifting here. It’s an appeal to the authority of exposure, not theory: the speaker’s credibility comes from accumulated encounters with reality’s edge cases, the ones that embarrass tidy systems.
The gendered framing is the quote’s most loaded move. “The impression of a woman” trades on a period stereotype of feminine intuition, but it also smuggles in a broader argument about epistemology: some forms of knowledge are pattern-recognition, social perception, emotional inference. Those can be dismissed as soft because they can’t always be footnoted. Doyle suggests that’s precisely why they matter. An “analytical reasoner” can be brilliantly wrong when the premises are incomplete; an “impression” can be useful because it registers what analysis hasn’t learned to count yet.
There’s also a faint jab at masculine self-confidence. The sentence doesn’t reject reason; it demotes its swagger. Doyle’s subtext is pragmatic, not mystical: reality rewards whatever method actually predicts people, and people are rarely as logical as the logicians who study them.
The gendered framing is the quote’s most loaded move. “The impression of a woman” trades on a period stereotype of feminine intuition, but it also smuggles in a broader argument about epistemology: some forms of knowledge are pattern-recognition, social perception, emotional inference. Those can be dismissed as soft because they can’t always be footnoted. Doyle suggests that’s precisely why they matter. An “analytical reasoner” can be brilliantly wrong when the premises are incomplete; an “impression” can be useful because it registers what analysis hasn’t learned to count yet.
There’s also a faint jab at masculine self-confidence. The sentence doesn’t reject reason; it demotes its swagger. Doyle’s subtext is pragmatic, not mystical: reality rewards whatever method actually predicts people, and people are rarely as logical as the logicians who study them.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Arthur
Add to List






