"I have some friends, colleagues here at the Karolinska Institute and even in the United States and many other countries too, because we are working together as scientists"
About this Quote
What sounds like a mild, polite sentence is really a quiet manifesto: Lennart Nilsson insisting he belongs inside the scientific enterprise, not hovering outside it with a camera. As a photographer best known for making the invisible legible (most famously the fetus in utero), he understood that images don’t simply “document” science; they can become part of how science persuades, recruits funding, and earns public trust. So he doesn’t say he has editors, patrons, or subjects. He has friends and colleagues. The word choice upgrades his role from observer to collaborator.
The setting matters. The Karolinska Institute isn’t just a workplace; it’s a prestige machine that stamps certain kinds of knowledge as authoritative (Nobel territory). By naming it first, then widening to the United States and “many other countries,” Nilsson frames his work as international, networked, and therefore credible. It’s soft power: a way to pre-empt the suspicion that a photographer might sensationalize or aestheticize biology for attention.
The subtext is also defensive in a modern way. Scientific imagery sits on a fault line between education and propaganda, between wonder and manipulation. Nilsson’s line tries to settle that tension by anchoring his practice in teamwork and shared standards: “we are working together as scientists.” Coming from a photographer, it’s an audacious claim and a strategic one. He’s asking to be judged not by art-world notions of style, but by lab-world notions of rigor, access, and collective responsibility.
The setting matters. The Karolinska Institute isn’t just a workplace; it’s a prestige machine that stamps certain kinds of knowledge as authoritative (Nobel territory). By naming it first, then widening to the United States and “many other countries,” Nilsson frames his work as international, networked, and therefore credible. It’s soft power: a way to pre-empt the suspicion that a photographer might sensationalize or aestheticize biology for attention.
The subtext is also defensive in a modern way. Scientific imagery sits on a fault line between education and propaganda, between wonder and manipulation. Nilsson’s line tries to settle that tension by anchoring his practice in teamwork and shared standards: “we are working together as scientists.” Coming from a photographer, it’s an audacious claim and a strategic one. He’s asking to be judged not by art-world notions of style, but by lab-world notions of rigor, access, and collective responsibility.
Quote Details
| Topic | Friendship |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Lennart
Add to List


