"I imagine a child. That child is me. I can reconstruct and vividly remember portions of my own childhood. I can see, taste, smell, feel, and hear them. Then what I do is, not write about that kid or about his world, but start to think of a book that would have pleased him"
About this Quote
Pinkwater isn’t mining childhood as a quaint scrapbook; he’s using it as a tuning fork. The move is subtle: he begins with sensory certainty - "see, taste, smell" - the classic adult claim to authenticity. Then he swerves. He refuses the most available project for a children’s author: the memoir-ish recreation of "that kid" and "his world". Instead, he imagines an audience of one, and it’s his past self, not as a character to be explained but as a reader to be delighted.
That pivot carries the real intent. Pinkwater frames childhood less as subject matter than as a benchmark for artistic integrity. Adults are experts at narrativizing kids, turning them into symbols of innocence, trauma, resilience, whatever the market is buying. He’s suspicious of that. Writing "about" the child risks condescension, a kind of anthropological gaze where the adult author translates childhood for other adults. Writing "for" the child - specifically, for the child he remembers in his own body - is a way of dodging that trap. It’s a vow against talking down.
The subtext is almost consumerist in the best sense: the book has to pass the toughest focus group imaginable, a reader with zero patience for moralizing and a hair-trigger detector for boredom. Pinkwater’s context matters here: his work is known for oddball humor and unruly imagination. This method explains why. He’s not trying to preserve a lost world; he’s trying to build the sort of world a kid would willingly enter, then refuse to leave.
That pivot carries the real intent. Pinkwater frames childhood less as subject matter than as a benchmark for artistic integrity. Adults are experts at narrativizing kids, turning them into symbols of innocence, trauma, resilience, whatever the market is buying. He’s suspicious of that. Writing "about" the child risks condescension, a kind of anthropological gaze where the adult author translates childhood for other adults. Writing "for" the child - specifically, for the child he remembers in his own body - is a way of dodging that trap. It’s a vow against talking down.
The subtext is almost consumerist in the best sense: the book has to pass the toughest focus group imaginable, a reader with zero patience for moralizing and a hair-trigger detector for boredom. Pinkwater’s context matters here: his work is known for oddball humor and unruly imagination. This method explains why. He’s not trying to preserve a lost world; he’s trying to build the sort of world a kid would willingly enter, then refuse to leave.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Daniel
Add to List
