"I joined the Party definitely in 1923 after having already been in sympathy with it before"
About this Quote
The intent is double-edged. On one level, it’s a claim of early loyalty - 1923 is not random but a badge of being there near the beginning, before power made membership convenient. On another level, "sympathy" functions as a soft-focus word that blurs the timeline of responsibility. Sympathy is emotional, vague, deniable. Membership is concrete, documentable. By separating the two, he implies the dangerous part was merely feeling - and that feelings happen to you.
Context matters: Sauckel was not a detached foot soldier but a major Nazi official later responsible for forced labor policies. Read against that record, the sentence becomes a defense mechanism dressed as autobiography. It signals the postwar pose of many perpetrators: I was carried by currents; I formalized what was already in the air. The rhetorical trick is making complicity sound like administrative inevitability, turning choice into chronology.
Quote Details
| Topic | Life |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Sauckel, Fritz. (2026, January 17). I joined the Party definitely in 1923 after having already been in sympathy with it before. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-joined-the-party-definitely-in-1923-after-49522/
Chicago Style
Sauckel, Fritz. "I joined the Party definitely in 1923 after having already been in sympathy with it before." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-joined-the-party-definitely-in-1923-after-49522/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"I joined the Party definitely in 1923 after having already been in sympathy with it before." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-joined-the-party-definitely-in-1923-after-49522/. Accessed 19 Feb. 2026.





