"I know only that what is moral is what you feel good after and what is immoral is what you feel bad after"
About this Quote
Hemingway’s line sounds like moral philosophy stripped down to a hangover test: if you wake up clean, it was virtue; if you wake up sick, it was sin. The bluntness is the point. He’s not building an ethical system so much as exposing how most people actually navigate right and wrong when the lights are low and the stakes are personal.
The intent is almost aggressively anti-theoretical. Hemingway’s characters rarely get the luxury of clear commandments; they get consequences, shame, pride, and the slow accounting of what they can live with. Framing morality as “what you feel good after” turns ethics into aftermath, into the private reckoning that comes when the performance ends. It also carries a cold suggestion: conscience isn’t an abstract faculty, it’s a bodily sensation - relief or nausea, steadiness or self-disgust.
The subtext, though, is risky. If morality is just emotional residue, then a person with a dulled conscience can “feel good after” cruelty, and a person trained by guilt can “feel bad after” harmless pleasure. Hemingway’s minimalism hides a critique of moral posturing: public righteousness is cheap; the real verdict happens in solitude. But it also hints at his era’s disillusionment - post-World War I, when inherited moral languages felt inadequate and authenticity became its own virtue.
Contextually, this reads like Hemingway’s broader project: replacing lofty ideals with a code of conduct you can carry through chaos. Not purity, not doctrine - just the ability to respect yourself the morning after.
The intent is almost aggressively anti-theoretical. Hemingway’s characters rarely get the luxury of clear commandments; they get consequences, shame, pride, and the slow accounting of what they can live with. Framing morality as “what you feel good after” turns ethics into aftermath, into the private reckoning that comes when the performance ends. It also carries a cold suggestion: conscience isn’t an abstract faculty, it’s a bodily sensation - relief or nausea, steadiness or self-disgust.
The subtext, though, is risky. If morality is just emotional residue, then a person with a dulled conscience can “feel good after” cruelty, and a person trained by guilt can “feel bad after” harmless pleasure. Hemingway’s minimalism hides a critique of moral posturing: public righteousness is cheap; the real verdict happens in solitude. But it also hints at his era’s disillusionment - post-World War I, when inherited moral languages felt inadequate and authenticity became its own virtue.
Contextually, this reads like Hemingway’s broader project: replacing lofty ideals with a code of conduct you can carry through chaos. Not purity, not doctrine - just the ability to respect yourself the morning after.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Ernest
Add to List








