"I like animals because they are not consciously cruel and don't betray each other"
About this Quote
There is a hard, almost bruised kind of tenderness in Caldwell's preference: not adoration of animals so much as an indictment of people. The line turns on two loaded adverbs - "consciously" and "each other" - that do most of the moral work. Animals can be violent, but their violence is framed as instinct, not malice. Humans, by contrast, are uniquely capable of choosing cruelty, savoring it, narrating it to themselves as justified. Caldwell isn't arguing that animals are saintly; she's arguing that intention is the true horror.
"Betray" sharpens the blade. Cruelty can be impersonal, but betrayal is intimate. It implies trust, loyalty, a shared story that gets rewritten in the ugliest possible way. That word suggests Caldwell is speaking from emotional history, not abstract philosophy: a world of social punishments, broken confidences, and polite smiles that conceal knives. Read in the context of a 20th-century novelist who watched wars, ideologies, and domestic dramas shred ordinary decency, the quote feels less like misanthropy and more like self-defense - a strategy for locating reliable companionship in a century that made hypocrisy feel normal.
The sentence also flatters animals in a way that reveals a human longing: to be among creatures who cannot perform virtue for applause and cannot weaponize intimacy. It's a quiet rejection of the social game. Caldwell finds solace in the absence of calculation, and that solace doubles as a critique of a culture where calculation too often passes for intelligence.
"Betray" sharpens the blade. Cruelty can be impersonal, but betrayal is intimate. It implies trust, loyalty, a shared story that gets rewritten in the ugliest possible way. That word suggests Caldwell is speaking from emotional history, not abstract philosophy: a world of social punishments, broken confidences, and polite smiles that conceal knives. Read in the context of a 20th-century novelist who watched wars, ideologies, and domestic dramas shred ordinary decency, the quote feels less like misanthropy and more like self-defense - a strategy for locating reliable companionship in a century that made hypocrisy feel normal.
The sentence also flatters animals in a way that reveals a human longing: to be among creatures who cannot perform virtue for applause and cannot weaponize intimacy. It's a quiet rejection of the social game. Caldwell finds solace in the absence of calculation, and that solace doubles as a critique of a culture where calculation too often passes for intelligence.
Quote Details
| Topic | Pet Love |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Taylor
Add to List






