"I like decorative, functional things that I feel comfortable in"
About this Quote
It is a small sentence with a big tell: Adams is staking out an anti-glamour philosophy in an industry built on discomfort disguised as aspiration. “Decorative” nods to the visual contract actresses are often asked to fulfill, but she pairs it with “functional,” a word that quietly refuses the idea that beauty has to be useless, fragile, or punishing. That “and” is doing the work of a whole career-long negotiation: you can be looked at without being reduced to an object.
The last clause sharpens the stance into something almost political. “That I feel comfortable in” recenters authority on the wearer’s body, not the viewer’s gaze. Comfort becomes not laziness, but a boundary. It’s a soft-spoken rebuttal to red-carpet culture, to costuming that’s really compliance, to the idea that a woman’s public-facing self should be engineered for someone else’s approval. Adams doesn’t posture as a style theorist; she talks like a person who has actually had to move through rooms, sets, and expectations while being watched.
Context matters: a ’90s indie-era actress associated with a kind of approachable charisma, not untouchable couture. The line reads like a preference, but it’s also branding-by-values: practical beauty, intimacy over spectacle, self-possession over performance. In an attention economy that rewards suffering-as-chic, she’s arguing for a quieter metric of taste: does it work, and does it let me stay myself?
The last clause sharpens the stance into something almost political. “That I feel comfortable in” recenters authority on the wearer’s body, not the viewer’s gaze. Comfort becomes not laziness, but a boundary. It’s a soft-spoken rebuttal to red-carpet culture, to costuming that’s really compliance, to the idea that a woman’s public-facing self should be engineered for someone else’s approval. Adams doesn’t posture as a style theorist; she talks like a person who has actually had to move through rooms, sets, and expectations while being watched.
Context matters: a ’90s indie-era actress associated with a kind of approachable charisma, not untouchable couture. The line reads like a preference, but it’s also branding-by-values: practical beauty, intimacy over spectacle, self-possession over performance. In an attention economy that rewards suffering-as-chic, she’s arguing for a quieter metric of taste: does it work, and does it let me stay myself?
Quote Details
| Topic | Aesthetic |
|---|
More Quotes by Joey
Add to List
