"I, like many members of my generation, was concerned with segregation and the repeated violation of civil rights"
About this Quote
Stiglitz is doing something economists don’t always do in public: pinning his intellectual life to a moral weather system, not just a set of models. By opening with “I, like many members of my generation,” he folds personal biography into a cohort story, a quiet claim of legitimacy. He’s not presenting outrage as idiosyncratic virtue; he’s positioning it as a formative baseline for people who came of age alongside Brown v. Board, the Civil Rights Act, and the televised brutality that made “violation” feel less like legal jargon and more like a recurring headline.
The phrasing is careful. “Concerned” is restrained, almost technocratic, a word that won’t spook the policy world he inhabits. Yet the charge is sharp: “repeated violation of civil rights” frames injustice as systemic and iterative, not a tragic exception. That “repeated” matters; it suggests institutions learn to evade accountability, and that the real scandal isn’t merely segregation’s existence but its endurance through loopholes, enforcement failures, and political bargains.
In context, the line reads like an origin story for a certain kind of economics: one that treats inequality and power as central inputs, not externalities. Stiglitz’s later work on information asymmetry and market failures echoes the same logic embedded here: rights can be promised on paper and denied in practice when the rules are written by the powerful. The subtext is a challenge to “neutral” expertise. If your formative concern is civil rights being violated again and again, then the demand isn’t just better policy; it’s a better account of how societies rationalize unfairness while calling it efficient.
The phrasing is careful. “Concerned” is restrained, almost technocratic, a word that won’t spook the policy world he inhabits. Yet the charge is sharp: “repeated violation of civil rights” frames injustice as systemic and iterative, not a tragic exception. That “repeated” matters; it suggests institutions learn to evade accountability, and that the real scandal isn’t merely segregation’s existence but its endurance through loopholes, enforcement failures, and political bargains.
In context, the line reads like an origin story for a certain kind of economics: one that treats inequality and power as central inputs, not externalities. Stiglitz’s later work on information asymmetry and market failures echoes the same logic embedded here: rights can be promised on paper and denied in practice when the rules are written by the powerful. The subtext is a challenge to “neutral” expertise. If your formative concern is civil rights being violated again and again, then the demand isn’t just better policy; it’s a better account of how societies rationalize unfairness while calling it efficient.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Joseph
Add to List




