"I mean, this whole digital revolution is really eroding the director's importance on a movie because, number one, just from a practical standpoint, with floppy disks and the ability to put all of the film onto a disk, more people have access to the movie"
About this Quote
Frankenheimer is doing something directors rarely do in public: admitting the ground is shifting under their feet, and that the shift isn’t just aesthetic, it’s logistical. He frames the “digital revolution” as a practical problem first - “floppy disks,” “put all of the film onto a disk” - which dates the quote and also sharpens its anxiety. This is an era when digital was still clunky, physical, and newly portable, yet already threatening the old gatekeeping model. The point isn’t that disks are magical; it’s that distribution stops being scarce.
The subtext is labor politics disguised as tech talk. A director’s “importance” has always been bound up with control: who can see the footage, who can cut it, who can duplicate it, who can leak it, who can second-guess it. Frankenheimer is describing a future in which access multiplies the number of stakeholders. When “more people have access,” you get more notes, more versions, more surveillance of the process. Authority diffuses, and the director becomes less a singular author than a manager negotiating a swarm.
Coming from a filmmaker shaped by studio-era hierarchies and the hard-won prestige of the “director as auteur,” the line reads like a preemptive obituary for a certain kind of set power. It’s also quietly prophetic: today’s erosion isn’t just about editing tools, but about endless testability, algorithmic audience proxies, and IP-driven oversight. Frankenheimer’s real fear is not new art; it’s the loss of scarcity that once made his judgment final.
The subtext is labor politics disguised as tech talk. A director’s “importance” has always been bound up with control: who can see the footage, who can cut it, who can duplicate it, who can leak it, who can second-guess it. Frankenheimer is describing a future in which access multiplies the number of stakeholders. When “more people have access,” you get more notes, more versions, more surveillance of the process. Authority diffuses, and the director becomes less a singular author than a manager negotiating a swarm.
Coming from a filmmaker shaped by studio-era hierarchies and the hard-won prestige of the “director as auteur,” the line reads like a preemptive obituary for a certain kind of set power. It’s also quietly prophetic: today’s erosion isn’t just about editing tools, but about endless testability, algorithmic audience proxies, and IP-driven oversight. Frankenheimer’s real fear is not new art; it’s the loss of scarcity that once made his judgment final.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by John
Add to List
