"I met the president when he was president-elect at a meeting in Austin. He spoke of his faith. He spoke of his desire for a compassionate conservatism, for a faith-based initiative that would do something for poor people"
About this Quote
The line reads like a benign recollection, but it’s really a snapshot of a particular American moment when religion was being repackaged as policy branding. Jim Wallis, a progressive evangelical voice who has spent decades insisting faith should pull Christians toward the poor, isn’t just reporting what a president-elect said in Austin; he’s marking the hinge where moral language meets political marketing.
“Faith” here does double duty. It signals personal sincerity (a credential in modern U.S. politics) while also functioning as a bridge to “compassionate conservatism,” that early-2000s promise that you could keep the small-government instincts of the right and still claim the social conscience typically associated with the left. Wallis’s phrasing is careful: “He spoke of his desire” keeps the claim in the realm of aspiration, not achievement. The next clause sharpens the test: a “faith-based initiative that would do something for poor people.” Not “empower communities” or “strengthen families,” the usual euphemisms, but the blunt benchmark of material consequence.
The subtext is invitation and warning at once. Wallis is registering hope that the new administration might take poverty seriously, while also laying down a moral IOU: you told me your project was compassion; I’m going to remember that and measure you by it. The context, unmistakably, is the George W. Bush era’s effort to court religious voters while softening the hard edges of conservative governance. Wallis positions himself as both witness and potential conscience, documenting the pitch before the policy reality arrives.
“Faith” here does double duty. It signals personal sincerity (a credential in modern U.S. politics) while also functioning as a bridge to “compassionate conservatism,” that early-2000s promise that you could keep the small-government instincts of the right and still claim the social conscience typically associated with the left. Wallis’s phrasing is careful: “He spoke of his desire” keeps the claim in the realm of aspiration, not achievement. The next clause sharpens the test: a “faith-based initiative that would do something for poor people.” Not “empower communities” or “strengthen families,” the usual euphemisms, but the blunt benchmark of material consequence.
The subtext is invitation and warning at once. Wallis is registering hope that the new administration might take poverty seriously, while also laying down a moral IOU: you told me your project was compassion; I’m going to remember that and measure you by it. The context, unmistakably, is the George W. Bush era’s effort to court religious voters while softening the hard edges of conservative governance. Wallis positions himself as both witness and potential conscience, documenting the pitch before the policy reality arrives.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|
More Quotes by Jim
Add to List
