"I never wanted to be aligned to a mature group because they go off and become politicians and stuff"

Richard O'Brien's statement reveals an attitude of skepticism toward maturity and its associations, particularly when it comes to societal roles like those of politicians. Embedded within his words is a resistance to growing up in a conventional sense, implying that the process of maturing often strips individuals of their creativity, authenticity, and rebellion. O'Brien seems to associate maturity with conformity to social expectations and participation in established systems of power and authority, specifically the realm of politics.

The mention of becoming politicians serves as a symbol for succumbing to the systems and norms of adulthood: negotiation, compromise, and the often hollow pursuit of status or influence. Politicians in popular perception are frequently seen as figures who have lost touch with their original ideals, molded instead by pragmatism or the need to appeal to the largest number of people. O'Brien seems wary of the loss of spontaneous, unfiltered self-expression that may come with this transformation. By avoiding alignment with the "mature group", he signals his desire to keep alive a spirit of subversion, irreverence, and play.

There is also an undertone of critique regarding the socialization process itself. As people grow, societal pressures may force them to abandon youthful passions, eccentricities, or radical ideas in favor of more "respectable" roles. The choice not to align with maturity is, in O'Brien's view, a form of resistance to being co-opted by a system that prizes stability and predictability over imagination and boldness. Whether referencing artists, performers, or any group defined by a refusal to toe the line, O'Brien's words defend the right to remain forever restless and nonconformist. In essence, his statement is an affirmation of the freedom to retain one’s misfit identity rather than acquiesce to the often disappointing realities of adult social structures.