"I once was interviewed and got so exasperated that I said, 'What do you want, a shopping list?' They kept asking, 'What's in this picture?'"
About this Quote
The line lands like a dry slap because it exposes the interview ritual as a bad genre: the artist as human caption machine. Hodgkin’s “shopping list” isn’t a cute aside; it’s a refusal of the transactional demand that art be instantly inventory-able. A shopping list is pure utility: discrete items, clear quantities, nothing ambiguous. By offering that metaphor, he’s mocking the interviewer’s hunger for neat nouns, for a literal roll call of objects that can be typed up and filed as “meaning.”
The repeated question - “What’s in this picture?” - is the real tell. It assumes the painting’s value is in recognizables, in the sort of content you can point at. Hodgkin’s work (lush, abstract, often built from memory and emotional weather rather than observed scenes) is almost engineered to make that question feel wrong. His exasperation becomes a critique of a culture that treats visual art like a riddle with an answer key, or like journalism: who, what, where.
There’s also a power play here. Interviews often try to domesticate artists, to translate the stubborn, private logic of making into consumable narrative. Hodgkin’s quip keeps the mystery intact while signaling that he understands the game and declines to play along. It’s wit as boundary-setting: he’s not anti-explanation, he’s anti-reduction. The subtext: if you need a list, you’re missing the point - and you’re asking the wrong kind of question on purpose.
The repeated question - “What’s in this picture?” - is the real tell. It assumes the painting’s value is in recognizables, in the sort of content you can point at. Hodgkin’s work (lush, abstract, often built from memory and emotional weather rather than observed scenes) is almost engineered to make that question feel wrong. His exasperation becomes a critique of a culture that treats visual art like a riddle with an answer key, or like journalism: who, what, where.
There’s also a power play here. Interviews often try to domesticate artists, to translate the stubborn, private logic of making into consumable narrative. Hodgkin’s quip keeps the mystery intact while signaling that he understands the game and declines to play along. It’s wit as boundary-setting: he’s not anti-explanation, he’s anti-reduction. The subtext: if you need a list, you’re missing the point - and you’re asking the wrong kind of question on purpose.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by Howard
Add to List
