"I owe very, very much to Mozart; and if one studies, for instance, the way in which I write for string quartet, then one cannot deny that I have learned this directly from Mozart. And I am proud of it!"
About this Quote
Schoenberg is daring you to hear continuity where lazy history lessons insist on rupture. The go-to caricature casts him as the ice-cold demolition man of tonality, the patron saint of modernist alienation. Here he flips the script: the most notorious rule-breaker in Western music plants his flag in Mozart, the avatar of balance, clarity, and pleasure. That’s not a retreat into classicism; it’s a power move.
The intent is partly pedagogical and partly polemical. By naming the string quartet, Schoenberg points to a genre that functions like a lab bench: four voices, nowhere to hide, every line accountable. Mozart’s quartets model conversational counterpoint, motivic economy, and the art of making complexity feel inevitable. Schoenberg’s subtext is: if you think my music is “random” or purely theoretical, you’re not listening for craft. The discipline you admire in Mozart - tight thematic development, rigorous voice-leading, structural proportion - is exactly what he claims as lineage, even when the harmonic language changes.
Context matters: Schoenberg spent his career arguing that the “emancipation of dissonance” wasn’t an anarchic break but an historical necessity, an extension of the same internal logic that drove tonal music to its limits. “And I am proud of it!” lands as a jab at critics who treated influence like contamination: to admit debt is not to diminish originality; it’s to assert legitimacy. He’s positioning modernism as heir, not vandal - and insisting that the real tradition is technique, not comfort.
The intent is partly pedagogical and partly polemical. By naming the string quartet, Schoenberg points to a genre that functions like a lab bench: four voices, nowhere to hide, every line accountable. Mozart’s quartets model conversational counterpoint, motivic economy, and the art of making complexity feel inevitable. Schoenberg’s subtext is: if you think my music is “random” or purely theoretical, you’re not listening for craft. The discipline you admire in Mozart - tight thematic development, rigorous voice-leading, structural proportion - is exactly what he claims as lineage, even when the harmonic language changes.
Context matters: Schoenberg spent his career arguing that the “emancipation of dissonance” wasn’t an anarchic break but an historical necessity, an extension of the same internal logic that drove tonal music to its limits. “And I am proud of it!” lands as a jab at critics who treated influence like contamination: to admit debt is not to diminish originality; it’s to assert legitimacy. He’s positioning modernism as heir, not vandal - and insisting that the real tradition is technique, not comfort.
Quote Details
| Topic | Music |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Arnold
Add to List

