"I prefer peace. But if trouble must come, let it come in my time, so that my children can live in peace"
About this Quote
Paine’s line is the revolutionary’s version of a parental vow: a preference for calm that immediately yields to a harder ethic of timing and responsibility. It works because it refuses the cozy fantasy that peace is a moral stance you can simply choose and keep. “I prefer peace” is almost disarmingly plain, a nod to ordinary human appetite for stability. Then the sentence turns on “But,” and Paine’s real argument snaps into place: conflict is not always optional, only deferrable, and deferral has victims.
The key subtext is generational triage. By saying “let it come in my time,” Paine casts himself as a shock absorber, volunteering his own era as the impact zone. It’s sacrificial, but also strategic: he is reframing war and upheaval as an investment with a payout schedule. The children aren’t just literal offspring; they’re the next polity. In a revolutionary context, that’s a sales pitch aimed at the hesitant: endure the instability now so the republic can be stable later. It’s also a rebuke to comfortable moderates who preach peace while outsourcing the cost of preserving it.
Paine wrote in a moment when “trouble” wasn’t abstract. British imperial power, colonial unrest, and the wager of independence made neutrality feel like a luxury ideology. The line’s rhetorical power comes from its moral accounting: it turns fear of conflict into an argument for facing it, and it launders radical change through the respectable language of protecting one’s children. Peace, in Paine’s framing, isn’t passivity. It’s a future that has to be fought into existence.
The key subtext is generational triage. By saying “let it come in my time,” Paine casts himself as a shock absorber, volunteering his own era as the impact zone. It’s sacrificial, but also strategic: he is reframing war and upheaval as an investment with a payout schedule. The children aren’t just literal offspring; they’re the next polity. In a revolutionary context, that’s a sales pitch aimed at the hesitant: endure the instability now so the republic can be stable later. It’s also a rebuke to comfortable moderates who preach peace while outsourcing the cost of preserving it.
Paine wrote in a moment when “trouble” wasn’t abstract. British imperial power, colonial unrest, and the wager of independence made neutrality feel like a luxury ideology. The line’s rhetorical power comes from its moral accounting: it turns fear of conflict into an argument for facing it, and it launders radical change through the respectable language of protecting one’s children. Peace, in Paine’s framing, isn’t passivity. It’s a future that has to be fought into existence.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Thomas Paine , "The American Crisis" (commonly quoted as: "I prefer peace. But if there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace.") |
More Quotes by Thomas
Add to List
