"I propose a Constitutional Amendment providing that, if any public official, elected or appointed, at any level of government, is caught lying to any member of the public for any reason, the punishment shall be death by public hanging"
About this Quote
Smith’s line is less a policy proposal than a stress test: a deliberately monstrous “solution” meant to expose how normalized official dishonesty has become. By leaping straight to “death by public hanging,” he borrows the brutal theater of old-world punishment, not because he’s secretly nostalgic for scaffolds, but because he wants the reader to feel the violence that lies can do when they come stamped with state authority. The extremity is the point; it’s moral shock therapy.
The specific intent is libertarian provocation. Smith isn’t arguing for calibrated reform or better fact-checking. He’s staging a fantasy of perfect accountability in a system designed to diffuse it. “Any public official… at any level” reads like a sweep-net thrown over the entire bureaucracy, collapsing the usual hierarchy of culpability. “To any member of the public for any reason” erases the standard evasions: national security, political necessity, miscommunication. No wiggle room, no PR cleanse.
The subtext is suspicion of government as a class: the premise that lying isn’t an occasional deviation but a structural habit enabled by impunity. “Constitutional Amendment” adds a delicious irony: the same state apparatus he distrusts is tasked with enforcing the ultimate punishment for its own misconduct. That contradiction is part of the rhetorical trap. You’re invited to nod along in anger, then flinch at what your anger endorses.
Contextually, this belongs to a late-20th-century American tradition of anti-establishment sci-fi and polemical rhetoric, where hyperbole operates as a truth-teller’s crowbar: pry open complacency by making the “reasonable” reforms look suddenly timid.
The specific intent is libertarian provocation. Smith isn’t arguing for calibrated reform or better fact-checking. He’s staging a fantasy of perfect accountability in a system designed to diffuse it. “Any public official… at any level” reads like a sweep-net thrown over the entire bureaucracy, collapsing the usual hierarchy of culpability. “To any member of the public for any reason” erases the standard evasions: national security, political necessity, miscommunication. No wiggle room, no PR cleanse.
The subtext is suspicion of government as a class: the premise that lying isn’t an occasional deviation but a structural habit enabled by impunity. “Constitutional Amendment” adds a delicious irony: the same state apparatus he distrusts is tasked with enforcing the ultimate punishment for its own misconduct. That contradiction is part of the rhetorical trap. You’re invited to nod along in anger, then flinch at what your anger endorses.
Contextually, this belongs to a late-20th-century American tradition of anti-establishment sci-fi and polemical rhetoric, where hyperbole operates as a truth-teller’s crowbar: pry open complacency by making the “reasonable” reforms look suddenly timid.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Neil Smith
Add to List









