"I questioned everything. I didn't see a character developed in Platoon at all. The character in Blue Velvet was much more fascinating to me"
About this Quote
MacLachlan is basically confessing a kind of actorly heresy: he wasn’t chasing the “important” movie, he was chasing the interesting one. In the late 1980s, Platoon had become shorthand for serious American cinema - combat realism, moral mud, prestige by association with trauma. By saying he “questioned everything” and “didn’t see a character developed…at all,” he’s poking at the way cultural consensus can confuse gravity with craft. War, as a subject, arrives pre-loaded with meaning; an actor can end up servicing the event instead of inhabiting a person.
The Blue Velvet comparison is telling because it’s not just about taste, it’s about permission. Lynch’s suburban nightmare runs on contradiction: innocence curdling into perversion, surfaces that lie. That creates roles where psychology isn’t neatly explained; it’s performed in fragments, impulses, and uneasy charm. For an actor, that’s oxygen. “More fascinating” signals a preference for characters with hidden rooms over characters who mainly function as representatives of an argument.
There’s subtext, too, about artistic identity. MacLachlan was becoming the face of a certain surreal, off-kilter America; he’s defending that lane against the era’s pieties. He’s also critiquing a broader awards-season logic: we reward movies that look like they’re about Something, even when the people inside them are sketched in bold strokes. His intent reads less like contrarianism than a statement of values: give me specificity, give me mystery, give me a human being rather than a symbol wearing dog tags.
The Blue Velvet comparison is telling because it’s not just about taste, it’s about permission. Lynch’s suburban nightmare runs on contradiction: innocence curdling into perversion, surfaces that lie. That creates roles where psychology isn’t neatly explained; it’s performed in fragments, impulses, and uneasy charm. For an actor, that’s oxygen. “More fascinating” signals a preference for characters with hidden rooms over characters who mainly function as representatives of an argument.
There’s subtext, too, about artistic identity. MacLachlan was becoming the face of a certain surreal, off-kilter America; he’s defending that lane against the era’s pieties. He’s also critiquing a broader awards-season logic: we reward movies that look like they’re about Something, even when the people inside them are sketched in bold strokes. His intent reads less like contrarianism than a statement of values: give me specificity, give me mystery, give me a human being rather than a symbol wearing dog tags.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Kyle
Add to List





