"I realise that in this undertaking I place myself in a certain opposition to views widely held concerning the mathematical infinite and to opinions frequently defended on the nature of numbers"
About this Quote
Cantor opens with the polite throat-clearing of a man about to commit intellectual arson. “I realise” isn’t modesty so much as tactical awareness: he knows he’s stepping into a fight where the referees are centuries of philosophical unease about infinity. The key phrase is “certain opposition” - carefully hedged, almost bureaucratic - which makes the challenge sharper, not softer. He’s not declaring war on his colleagues; he’s announcing that their shared common sense has a blind spot.
The subtext is that “widely held views” aren’t merely wrong, they’re socially enforced. In Cantor’s day, infinity wasn’t just a technical issue; it was a boundary marker between respectable mathematics and metaphysics. The “mathematical infinite” had long been treated as a useful fiction (potential infinity: processes that can continue) rather than an object you could handle (actual infinity: completed totalities). Cantor’s set theory and transfinite numbers did exactly that: they made infinity countable in different sizes, turning a philosophical anxiety into a manipulable framework.
The second half - “opinions frequently defended on the nature of numbers” - hints at how entrenched this was. “Defended” suggests ideology, not mere preference. He’s anticipating not just critique but moralized resistance: numbers are supposed to be safe, foundational, uncontested. Cantor’s genius was to show that the foundations were already contested; he just formalized the dispute with proofs. The line reads like a preemptive footnote to controversy: yes, I know you’ll hate this. Watch me make it work anyway.
The subtext is that “widely held views” aren’t merely wrong, they’re socially enforced. In Cantor’s day, infinity wasn’t just a technical issue; it was a boundary marker between respectable mathematics and metaphysics. The “mathematical infinite” had long been treated as a useful fiction (potential infinity: processes that can continue) rather than an object you could handle (actual infinity: completed totalities). Cantor’s set theory and transfinite numbers did exactly that: they made infinity countable in different sizes, turning a philosophical anxiety into a manipulable framework.
The second half - “opinions frequently defended on the nature of numbers” - hints at how entrenched this was. “Defended” suggests ideology, not mere preference. He’s anticipating not just critique but moralized resistance: numbers are supposed to be safe, foundational, uncontested. Cantor’s genius was to show that the foundations were already contested; he just formalized the dispute with proofs. The line reads like a preemptive footnote to controversy: yes, I know you’ll hate this. Watch me make it work anyway.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|
More Quotes by Georg
Add to List





