"I realized immediately that this was a terribly important discovery, but I didn't realize how important it would be until we had spent a lot of time in the laboratory studying it"
About this Quote
Johanson’s line captures a scientist’s least cinematic moment: the instant you know you’ve found something big, paired with the slow, grinding humility of proving it. The first clause is the rush of field discovery - the gut-level recognition that the ground has just shifted. The second clause undercuts any myth of the lone genius triumphantly holding up a fossil as history rearranges itself on cue. Importance, he’s saying, is not a property of an object; it’s something you earn through method.
That tension matters in Johanson’s context. As the paleoanthropologist who discovered “Lucy” in 1974, he didn’t just pick up bones; he picked up an argument about human origins. A partial skeleton in Ethiopia suggested bipedalism preceded big brains, complicating tidy evolutionary narratives. But that kind of claim doesn’t travel on intuition. It travels on measurements, comparisons, peer scrutiny, and the boring work of turning a hunch into a consensus.
The subtext is also political, in the quiet way science is political: it’s a defense of process in a culture that rewards hot takes and instant meaning. Johanson admits the emotional immediacy of discovery while insisting that understanding is delayed, collective, and contingent. The quote works because it dramatizes a paradox at the heart of research: certainty arrives early as feeling, then returns later - if you’re lucky - as evidence.
That tension matters in Johanson’s context. As the paleoanthropologist who discovered “Lucy” in 1974, he didn’t just pick up bones; he picked up an argument about human origins. A partial skeleton in Ethiopia suggested bipedalism preceded big brains, complicating tidy evolutionary narratives. But that kind of claim doesn’t travel on intuition. It travels on measurements, comparisons, peer scrutiny, and the boring work of turning a hunch into a consensus.
The subtext is also political, in the quiet way science is political: it’s a defense of process in a culture that rewards hot takes and instant meaning. Johanson admits the emotional immediacy of discovery while insisting that understanding is delayed, collective, and contingent. The quote works because it dramatizes a paradox at the heart of research: certainty arrives early as feeling, then returns later - if you’re lucky - as evidence.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Donald
Add to List
