"I reject that. I would rather recruit a Racist left winger than a right winger"
About this Quote
That blunt preference is less a political statement than a recruitment tactic disguised as ideology. Metzger isn’t weighing policy; he’s sorting for usability. The key verb is “recruit”: the speaker casts himself as a talent scout for hate, not a partisan. “Reject” signals a gatekeeping posture, a way to look principled while making a deeply opportunistic choice.
The line’s real work happens in the phrase “Racist left winger.” It tries to normalize racism as a detachable module that can be bolted onto any politics. That framing quietly flatters the target: you can keep your labor politics, your anti-elite anger, your outsider identity - just bring the prejudice. In other words, the pitch is, “Your tribe can stay your tribe; your racism can come home to mine.” It’s an invitation to people who don’t want to admit they’re crossing over, because the crossover is presented as a small adjustment rather than a moral rupture.
Choosing a “left winger” over a “right winger” also functions as strategic triangulation. It implies the far right already has the right; the growth market is disaffected leftists, the ones angry enough to be pried loose by cultural resentment. Subtext: traditional conservative channels are crowded, compromised, or insufficiently radical; the real prize is converting economic grievance into racial grievance.
As a piece of propaganda, it’s cynical and efficient: it rebrands extremism as a big-tent project, reframing racism from an identity into a transferable skill - one that can be “recruited,” trained, and deployed.
The line’s real work happens in the phrase “Racist left winger.” It tries to normalize racism as a detachable module that can be bolted onto any politics. That framing quietly flatters the target: you can keep your labor politics, your anti-elite anger, your outsider identity - just bring the prejudice. In other words, the pitch is, “Your tribe can stay your tribe; your racism can come home to mine.” It’s an invitation to people who don’t want to admit they’re crossing over, because the crossover is presented as a small adjustment rather than a moral rupture.
Choosing a “left winger” over a “right winger” also functions as strategic triangulation. It implies the far right already has the right; the growth market is disaffected leftists, the ones angry enough to be pried loose by cultural resentment. Subtext: traditional conservative channels are crowded, compromised, or insufficiently radical; the real prize is converting economic grievance into racial grievance.
As a piece of propaganda, it’s cynical and efficient: it rebrands extremism as a big-tent project, reframing racism from an identity into a transferable skill - one that can be “recruited,” trained, and deployed.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Tom
Add to List
