"I said in sharp language that that practice was wrong"
About this Quote
The repetition, too, is telling: "that that" reads like a verbal stumble, but it also mirrors the mental double-clutch of a lawyer threading a needle. He wants the record to show he condemned something, yet he avoids naming the people, the institution, or the behavior in a way that would invite follow-up questions: What practice? When? To whom? What did you actually say? The sentence performs conscience while protecting exposure.
Context matters because Starr's public identity was forged in the politics of judgment - most prominently the Clinton investigation, where moral language and legal process were fused into national spectacle. Later, he was repeatedly pulled into controversies that made questions of "what did you know, and how forcefully did you object?" suddenly personal. This quote reads like a preemptive deposition answer aimed at history: I objected; I did it strongly; therefore don't lump me in.
The subtext isn't just "I disapproved". It's "I should not be held responsible for what followed", packaged in the clean, prosecutorial certainty of "wrong" and the hazy, non-action of "said."
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Starr, Ken. (2026, January 16). I said in sharp language that that practice was wrong. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-said-in-sharp-language-that-that-practice-was-127430/
Chicago Style
Starr, Ken. "I said in sharp language that that practice was wrong." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-said-in-sharp-language-that-that-practice-was-127430/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"I said in sharp language that that practice was wrong." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-said-in-sharp-language-that-that-practice-was-127430/. Accessed 31 Mar. 2026.







