"I should have considered it wrong to have finished the Frieze before the room for its accommodation and the funds for its completion were available"
About this Quote
The sentence reveals a practical and ethical credo behind Edvard Munchs most ambitious projects: monumental art should be conceived for a specific place and supported with real resources, not produced in a vacuum or on speculation. Calling it wrong to finish the Frieze before a room and funds existed, he rejects the romantic image of the solitary genius working regardless of circumstance. For cycles like his Frieze of Life, context was not an afterthought but part of the work. Scale, light, sequence, and the way viewers move through a space all shape meaning. Without a dedicated room, the narrative loses coherence; without funding, the artist is pushed toward compromise, dispersal, or abandonment.
Munchs insistence also reflects the precarious economics of modern art around 1900. He had known rejection and scandal, and he understood that large undertakings demanded patronage and institutional support. The word wrong carries a moral edge: to finish without guarantees would be a betrayal of the works integrity and the artists livelihood. It is a refusal to let the artwork become a set of salable fragments rather than a living whole.
The principle guided his practice from the Berlin exhibitions of the Frieze of Life to the later Aula decorations for the University of Oslo, where he calibrated compositions to the rivers of daylight and the architecture of the hall. He imagined friezes as environments that viewers inhabit, not merely pictures on walls. By tying completion to a specific room, he makes architecture a collaborator and asserts control over how the cycle is read.
There is also a modern lesson in project discipline. Vision is not enough; conditions must be created that allow the vision to endure. Munchs pragmatism protects both the poetry and the survival of the work, reminding us that great art often depends on agreements about space, time, and money as much as on inspiration.
Munchs insistence also reflects the precarious economics of modern art around 1900. He had known rejection and scandal, and he understood that large undertakings demanded patronage and institutional support. The word wrong carries a moral edge: to finish without guarantees would be a betrayal of the works integrity and the artists livelihood. It is a refusal to let the artwork become a set of salable fragments rather than a living whole.
The principle guided his practice from the Berlin exhibitions of the Frieze of Life to the later Aula decorations for the University of Oslo, where he calibrated compositions to the rivers of daylight and the architecture of the hall. He imagined friezes as environments that viewers inhabit, not merely pictures on walls. By tying completion to a specific room, he makes architecture a collaborator and asserts control over how the cycle is read.
There is also a modern lesson in project discipline. Vision is not enough; conditions must be created that allow the vision to endure. Munchs pragmatism protects both the poetry and the survival of the work, reminding us that great art often depends on agreements about space, time, and money as much as on inspiration.
Quote Details
| Topic | Learning from Mistakes |
|---|
More Quotes by Edvard
Add to List
