"I spent, as you know, a year and a half in a clergyman's family and heard almost every Tuesday the very best, most earnest and most impressive preacher it has ever been my fortune to meet with, but it produced no effect whatever on my mind"
About this Quote
Wallace’s line lands with the cool bluntness of a man reporting an experiment that simply failed to replicate. He isn’t mocking the preacher; he’s granting him every possible advantage: “very best,” “most earnest,” “most impressive.” The clincher is the clinical phrase “produced no effect whatever on my mind,” which treats sermon and soul the way a naturalist treats stimulus and response. If the strongest dose of rhetoric can’t move the needle, Wallace implies, then persuasion isn’t the issue. The apparatus of belief itself is what’s missing.
The subtext is sharper than it first appears. By emphasizing his long exposure in a “clergyman’s family” and the regularity of “almost every Tuesday,” he preempts the familiar charge that unbelief is ignorance, laziness, or lack of contact with piety. This is not the skeptic who never listened; it’s the listener who listened dutifully, repeatedly, under ideal conditions, and still found nothing catch.
Context matters: Wallace is a Victorian scientist writing in an era when public preaching was a dominant cultural technology and religious certainty was still the default social operating system. His refusal is quiet but radical: he recasts conversion not as a moral awakening but as a kind of cognitive event that can be tested and, in his case, doesn’t occur. The intent isn’t to sneer at faith; it’s to assert intellectual autonomy against a society that assumed eloquence could substitute for evidence.
The subtext is sharper than it first appears. By emphasizing his long exposure in a “clergyman’s family” and the regularity of “almost every Tuesday,” he preempts the familiar charge that unbelief is ignorance, laziness, or lack of contact with piety. This is not the skeptic who never listened; it’s the listener who listened dutifully, repeatedly, under ideal conditions, and still found nothing catch.
Context matters: Wallace is a Victorian scientist writing in an era when public preaching was a dominant cultural technology and religious certainty was still the default social operating system. His refusal is quiet but radical: he recasts conversion not as a moral awakening but as a kind of cognitive event that can be tested and, in his case, doesn’t occur. The intent isn’t to sneer at faith; it’s to assert intellectual autonomy against a society that assumed eloquence could substitute for evidence.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Alfred
Add to List



