"I still think in this country, and this might surprise you, the one thing that George Bush said as president that I do agree with, I love that phrase, 'the soft bigotry of low expectations.'"
About this Quote
Smiley’s compliment is a trapdoor: he flatters George W. Bush just long enough to make the phrase usable, then repurposes it for his own moral argument. “This might surprise you” is the tell. He’s signaling to his audience - likely skeptical of Bush-era rhetoric - that what follows isn’t capitulation but a tactical theft. By framing it as “the one thing” he agrees with, Smiley keeps his political credentials intact while borrowing the authority of a presidential catchphrase.
“The soft bigotry of low expectations” works because it turns a feel-good posture into an accusation. “Soft” implies the harm isn’t dramatic or easily prosecutable; it’s polite, managerial, even benevolent. “Bigotry” drags that politeness into the moral spotlight, insisting that lowered standards can be prejudice in disguise. The phrase is sharp because it indicts systems without needing a villain twirling a mustache: teachers who excuse, institutions that patronize, policymakers who design “help” that assumes failure.
Smiley’s subtext is aimed at liberal and conservative audiences at once. To conservatives, it echoes personal responsibility and accountability. To progressives, it’s a critique of paternalism and a demand for structural seriousness: don’t confuse empathy with diminished rigor. Context matters too: Bush popularized the line in an era of education reform language (standards, testing, “No Child Left Behind”), and Smiley’s use suggests a wary agreement with the diagnosis even if he rejects the administration’s prescriptions. It’s less bipartisan harmony than rhetorical jujitsu.
“The soft bigotry of low expectations” works because it turns a feel-good posture into an accusation. “Soft” implies the harm isn’t dramatic or easily prosecutable; it’s polite, managerial, even benevolent. “Bigotry” drags that politeness into the moral spotlight, insisting that lowered standards can be prejudice in disguise. The phrase is sharp because it indicts systems without needing a villain twirling a mustache: teachers who excuse, institutions that patronize, policymakers who design “help” that assumes failure.
Smiley’s subtext is aimed at liberal and conservative audiences at once. To conservatives, it echoes personal responsibility and accountability. To progressives, it’s a critique of paternalism and a demand for structural seriousness: don’t confuse empathy with diminished rigor. Context matters too: Bush popularized the line in an era of education reform language (standards, testing, “No Child Left Behind”), and Smiley’s use suggests a wary agreement with the diagnosis even if he rejects the administration’s prescriptions. It’s less bipartisan harmony than rhetorical jujitsu.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Tavis
Add to List







