"I stopped this one about two months before federation and I want the next one to be more political. It will deal with the formation of white Australian policy and things like that"
About this Quote
You can hear the historical clock ticking in McCullough's blunt practicality: she "stopped" a book not because the muse failed, but because the calendar of nationhood demanded a better entry point. "Two months before federation" isn’t just a date; it’s a narrative lever. Start too early and you risk writing prelude. Start too late and you miss the messy bargaining where a country’s ideals get drafted alongside its exclusions.
Her real tell is "more political" - a phrase that reads like a corrective, even a self-challenge. McCullough was never shy about big canvases, but here she’s naming an intent to move from saga to system: from personalities and period texture to the machinery of power. That shift matters because federation gets packaged, in civic mythology, as a clean birth story. She’s signaling interest in the unclean parts: policy as the true founding drama.
Then she lands the phrase that makes the temperature drop: "white Australian policy". No euphemism, no soft focus. The subtext is that Australia’s national identity wasn’t merely imagined; it was legislated. By framing it as "formation" she implies deliberation and design, not accidental prejudice - the kind of choice that can be traced, argued over, and therefore judged.
McCullough’s context as a bestselling historical novelist is crucial. She’s not announcing a dissertation; she’s telegraphing a cultural intervention, smuggling political history into popular narrative where it can’t be politely ignored. The sentence is almost workmanlike, which is precisely why it hits: the exclusionary spine of the nation described as just another plot problem to solve, because that’s how it was treated at the time.
Her real tell is "more political" - a phrase that reads like a corrective, even a self-challenge. McCullough was never shy about big canvases, but here she’s naming an intent to move from saga to system: from personalities and period texture to the machinery of power. That shift matters because federation gets packaged, in civic mythology, as a clean birth story. She’s signaling interest in the unclean parts: policy as the true founding drama.
Then she lands the phrase that makes the temperature drop: "white Australian policy". No euphemism, no soft focus. The subtext is that Australia’s national identity wasn’t merely imagined; it was legislated. By framing it as "formation" she implies deliberation and design, not accidental prejudice - the kind of choice that can be traced, argued over, and therefore judged.
McCullough’s context as a bestselling historical novelist is crucial. She’s not announcing a dissertation; she’s telegraphing a cultural intervention, smuggling political history into popular narrative where it can’t be politely ignored. The sentence is almost workmanlike, which is precisely why it hits: the exclusionary spine of the nation described as just another plot problem to solve, because that’s how it was treated at the time.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Colleen
Add to List



