"I suggested that we had experience in helping other countries build their military forces, and we would be willing and happy to do the same for Afghanistan, together with the United States"
About this Quote
A soft-edged offer that still lands like strategy. Ecevit’s line is built to sound purely cooperative - “willing and happy” - yet it’s really a bid to shape the terms of Afghanistan’s future security architecture while staying safely inside the American-led tent. The key phrase is “we had experience,” a quiet credential-drop that pulls Turkey out of the category of secondary ally and into the role of seasoned state-builder. It implies: we’ve done this before, we know how to train, organize, professionalize - and we can do it with fewer cultural tripwires than outsiders who arrive with tanks and exit strategies.
The subtext sits in “together with the United States.” That’s not deference so much as insurance. In the post-9/11 era and the early years of the Afghanistan intervention, NATO’s credibility and Washington’s patience were both on the line. Ecevit is signaling reliability to the Americans while also protecting Turkey from looking like it’s freelancing in Central/South Asia. Partnership becomes a shield against blowback.
There’s also a regional branding play: Turkey, a Muslim-majority NATO member, positioning itself as translator between Western security doctrine and a society that might reject it when it arrives as occupation. “Helping build” avoids the politically toxic vocabulary of control; it frames militarization as capacity-building, modernization, even mentorship. The sentence is diplomacy doing what it does best: presenting power as assistance, and influence as goodwill.
The subtext sits in “together with the United States.” That’s not deference so much as insurance. In the post-9/11 era and the early years of the Afghanistan intervention, NATO’s credibility and Washington’s patience were both on the line. Ecevit is signaling reliability to the Americans while also protecting Turkey from looking like it’s freelancing in Central/South Asia. Partnership becomes a shield against blowback.
There’s also a regional branding play: Turkey, a Muslim-majority NATO member, positioning itself as translator between Western security doctrine and a society that might reject it when it arrives as occupation. “Helping build” avoids the politically toxic vocabulary of control; it frames militarization as capacity-building, modernization, even mentorship. The sentence is diplomacy doing what it does best: presenting power as assistance, and influence as goodwill.
Quote Details
| Topic | Military & Soldier |
|---|
More Quotes by Bulent
Add to List






