"I tend to resist invitations to interpret my own fiction"
About this Quote
Coetzee’s refusal is a power move dressed as modesty. “I tend to resist invitations” sounds polite, almost social, but the phrasing frames interpretation as an external pressure - a demand placed on the writer to deliver the “answer key.” For a novelist whose work repeatedly stages power as something administered through institutions, procedures, and sanctioned narratives, the line reads like a small act of civil disobedience against the literary version of bureaucracy: the Q&A, the author interview, the prestige festival circuit where meaning is expected to arrive with a name badge.
The subtext is twofold. First, he’s denying the comforting fantasy that art can be secured by authorial intent, that ambiguity is merely a temporarily missing footnote. Coetzee resists because explanation converts a living text into an exhibit: labeled, managed, safe. Second, he’s questioning the ethics of authority itself. If the author interprets, the author governs; alternative readings become errors rather than encounters. Coming from Coetzee - a writer associated with apartheid-era South Africa and its aftermath, where official interpretations weren’t harmless but coercive - that suspicion lands with historical bite.
Context matters: Coetzee is famously private, skeptical of confession and personality-as-brand. In a culture that treats artists as content providers, his restraint is also an argument for the reader’s autonomy. The line insists that fiction should operate like life does: without a supervisor stepping in to clarify the moral, without a definitive voice to close the case.
The subtext is twofold. First, he’s denying the comforting fantasy that art can be secured by authorial intent, that ambiguity is merely a temporarily missing footnote. Coetzee resists because explanation converts a living text into an exhibit: labeled, managed, safe. Second, he’s questioning the ethics of authority itself. If the author interprets, the author governs; alternative readings become errors rather than encounters. Coming from Coetzee - a writer associated with apartheid-era South Africa and its aftermath, where official interpretations weren’t harmless but coercive - that suspicion lands with historical bite.
Context matters: Coetzee is famously private, skeptical of confession and personality-as-brand. In a culture that treats artists as content providers, his restraint is also an argument for the reader’s autonomy. The line insists that fiction should operate like life does: without a supervisor stepping in to clarify the moral, without a definitive voice to close the case.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by M. Coetzee
Add to List
