"I therefore shared fully the intense chagrin of the New York and other State delegations when, on the third ballot, Abraham Lincoln received a larger vote than Seward"
About this Quote
The sting in Villard's sentence is doing double duty: it records a political moment and quietly advertises the speaker's proximity to power. "I therefore shared fully" is less confession than credentialing, the language of a correspondent making sure you know he was close enough to feel the heat. The phrase "intense chagrin" is tellingly refined; it dresses up partisan disappointment as cultivated emotion, the kind a serious observer is supposed to experience when history goes "off script."
Context sharpens the edge. Villard is describing the 1860 Republican National Convention, where William H. Seward entered as the establishment favorite and Abraham Lincoln emerged as the coalition candidate. On the third ballot, the math of delegate trading and regional anxieties about Seward's perceived radicalism snapped into place. Villard aligns himself with the New York delegation not just geographically but ideologically: Seward represented the known quantity, the polished anti-slavery statesman; Lincoln, to many insiders, looked like a compromise sprung by backroom pragmatism.
The subtext is a lesson in how "surprise" winners are often engineered, not accidental. Villard's chagrin hints at the old story political professionals tell themselves: that the party should choose its best man, not its most saleable one. Yet history makes that posture awkward. Knowing Lincoln's eventual stature, Villard's disappointment reads as a snapshot of elite miscalculation - and as an honest admission that even good reporters can be trapped by the expectations of their circles.
Context sharpens the edge. Villard is describing the 1860 Republican National Convention, where William H. Seward entered as the establishment favorite and Abraham Lincoln emerged as the coalition candidate. On the third ballot, the math of delegate trading and regional anxieties about Seward's perceived radicalism snapped into place. Villard aligns himself with the New York delegation not just geographically but ideologically: Seward represented the known quantity, the polished anti-slavery statesman; Lincoln, to many insiders, looked like a compromise sprung by backroom pragmatism.
The subtext is a lesson in how "surprise" winners are often engineered, not accidental. Villard's chagrin hints at the old story political professionals tell themselves: that the party should choose its best man, not its most saleable one. Yet history makes that posture awkward. Knowing Lincoln's eventual stature, Villard's disappointment reads as a snapshot of elite miscalculation - and as an honest admission that even good reporters can be trapped by the expectations of their circles.
Quote Details
| Topic | Decision-Making |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Henry
Add to List



