"I think also of my colleagues in elementary particle theory in many lands, and feel that in some measure I am here as a representative of our small, informal, international fraternity"
About this Quote
Even in the ceremonious glow of an award podium, Gell-Mann pulls the camera off himself and pans out to the tribe. The line is doing a quiet bit of rhetorical engineering: it converts a personal honor into a collective credential, insisting that prestige in physics is never purely individual, even when it arrives stamped with one name.
“Many lands” matters. This is Cold War-era language that sidesteps flags without pretending politics don’t exist. Particle theory depended on conferences, preprints, and long-distance arguments conducted across borders that governments were busy hardening. Gell-Mann’s phrasing offers an alternate map of the world, drawn not by alliances but by shared problems, shared notation, shared obsessions. It’s internationalism with a lab coat on: less kumbaya than infrastructure.
The subtext is also a defense of the field’s peculiar economy. Elementary particle theory is small enough to be a “fraternity,” but powerful enough to shape what counts as fundamental knowledge. By calling it “informal,” he emphasizes the community’s real operating system: not committees and ministries, but reputation, correspondence, and a rolling consensus forged in seminar rooms. That informality flatters the ideal of science as meritocratic and self-correcting, even as it hints at the gatekeeping that comes with any tight network.
Most revealing is “in some measure.” It’s modesty with precision. He neither disowns authorship nor hoards it. He claims a fraction of representation, acknowledging that breakthroughs emerge from a crowd of rivals and collaborators, all pushing on the same locked door.
“Many lands” matters. This is Cold War-era language that sidesteps flags without pretending politics don’t exist. Particle theory depended on conferences, preprints, and long-distance arguments conducted across borders that governments were busy hardening. Gell-Mann’s phrasing offers an alternate map of the world, drawn not by alliances but by shared problems, shared notation, shared obsessions. It’s internationalism with a lab coat on: less kumbaya than infrastructure.
The subtext is also a defense of the field’s peculiar economy. Elementary particle theory is small enough to be a “fraternity,” but powerful enough to shape what counts as fundamental knowledge. By calling it “informal,” he emphasizes the community’s real operating system: not committees and ministries, but reputation, correspondence, and a rolling consensus forged in seminar rooms. That informality flatters the ideal of science as meritocratic and self-correcting, even as it hints at the gatekeeping that comes with any tight network.
Most revealing is “in some measure.” It’s modesty with precision. He neither disowns authorship nor hoards it. He claims a fraction of representation, acknowledging that breakthroughs emerge from a crowd of rivals and collaborators, all pushing on the same locked door.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Nobel Lecture — Murray Gell-Mann, Nobel Prize in Physics 1969; lecture text (Stockholm), available from NobelPrize.org. |
More Quotes by Murray
Add to List
