"I think attacks on civilians in fact boost morale"
About this Quote
The intent reads less like a literal operational endorsement than a provocation aimed at the listener’s comfort. Paulin, long associated with pugnacious political commentary around Northern Ireland and British state power, has a record of testing the boundary between describing political violence and appearing to justify it. Here, the subtext is tribal and strategic: civilians aren’t framed as people but as a psychological instrument, collateral converted into messaging. “Boost morale” is chillingly managerial, borrowing the language of workplaces and sports to talk about terror. That mismatch is the point; it exposes how euphemism can make atrocity sound like tactics.
Context matters because the line echoes a long, ugly logic in insurgency and counterinsurgency alike: violence against noncombatants as leverage, spectacle, or retaliation. Coming from a poet, it also implicates art’s own temptations - the thrill of moral transgression, the performance of radical candor, the idea that scandal equals honesty. The quote works because it forces a question the speaker may be trying to dodge: is this critique of violent realism, or a flirtation with it?
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Paulin, Tom. (2026, January 18). I think attacks on civilians in fact boost morale. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-think-attacks-on-civilians-in-fact-boost-morale-11163/
Chicago Style
Paulin, Tom. "I think attacks on civilians in fact boost morale." FixQuotes. January 18, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-think-attacks-on-civilians-in-fact-boost-morale-11163/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"I think attacks on civilians in fact boost morale." FixQuotes, 18 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-think-attacks-on-civilians-in-fact-boost-morale-11163/. Accessed 19 Feb. 2026.


