"I think before 1997 is over, NATO will have taken giant strides in what's called adaptation, the discussions about bringing the French fully into the NATO forces"
About this Quote
A “giant strides” promise is doing careful diplomatic work here: it’s a way to sound decisive while describing a process designed to be anything but. Warren Christopher, speaking as America’s top diplomat in the late 1990s, is threading two needles at once. NATO is trying to reinvent itself after the Cold War, and France is still the famously semi-detached partner, outside NATO’s integrated military command since de Gaulle’s 1966 break while remaining politically in the alliance. Christopher’s intent is to project momentum - not just to allies, but to domestic audiences and wavering European capitals - that NATO can “adapt” without cracking.
The subtext is that “adaptation” is a euphemism for an institutional identity crisis. With the Soviet threat gone, NATO needs a new mission: crisis management, peacekeeping in the Balkans, and eventually enlargement eastward. Bringing France “fully into the NATO forces” isn’t just administrative; it’s symbolic. It would signal that even the alliance’s most sovereignty-obsessed member is willing to cede some autonomy to a US-led security architecture.
Notice the hedge: “what’s called adaptation.” Christopher distances himself from the jargon even as he uses it, a classic statesman’s move to acknowledge skepticism without feeding it. The time stamp - “before 1997 is over” - is also strategic pressure: it implies urgency while leaving room for the slow choreography of French domestic politics, inter-allied bargaining, and the quiet tradeoffs that make “giant strides” possible without anyone having to admit what they conceded.
The subtext is that “adaptation” is a euphemism for an institutional identity crisis. With the Soviet threat gone, NATO needs a new mission: crisis management, peacekeeping in the Balkans, and eventually enlargement eastward. Bringing France “fully into the NATO forces” isn’t just administrative; it’s symbolic. It would signal that even the alliance’s most sovereignty-obsessed member is willing to cede some autonomy to a US-led security architecture.
Notice the hedge: “what’s called adaptation.” Christopher distances himself from the jargon even as he uses it, a classic statesman’s move to acknowledge skepticism without feeding it. The time stamp - “before 1997 is over” - is also strategic pressure: it implies urgency while leaving room for the slow choreography of French domestic politics, inter-allied bargaining, and the quiet tradeoffs that make “giant strides” possible without anyone having to admit what they conceded.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Warren
Add to List


