"I think Col. North is first a U.S. citizen and he has the same rights as you yourself do, sir"
About this Quote
A small sentence that tries to do big constitutional work: Fawn Hall takes Oliver North, already infamous in the Iran-Contra scandal, and squeezes him back into the comforting shape of an ordinary American. The move is strategic. By opening with "I think", she softens what follows as personal opinion, not a legal argument, then immediately upgrades it into a civic credential: "first a U.S. citizen". That "first" is doing the heavy lifting, asking the audience to rank identity and rights above the messy specifics of covert operations, shredded documents, and executive power run amok.
The line also stages a moral reversal. North isn't framed as a government insider who may have abused authority; he's cast as a potentially over-scrutinized individual facing the glare of Congress and the media. In the late-80s cultural atmosphere, when televised hearings turned politics into daytime drama, that framing mattered. It offered viewers an easy channel for sympathy: whatever he did, he deserves fair treatment. The appeal is less about North than about the listener's self-image. "The same rights as you yourself do, sir" is a direct conscription of the questioner into her argument. If you deny him, you're denying yourself.
There's a quiet populism here, too: citizenship as the ultimate equalizer, even when the citizen in question operated within a national-security machine built on secrecy and hierarchy. Hall's intent isn't to exonerate so much as to relocate the debate from actions to process, from accountability to perceived fairness. It's a savvy reframing, and in a scandal defined by blurred lines, reframing was half the battle.
The line also stages a moral reversal. North isn't framed as a government insider who may have abused authority; he's cast as a potentially over-scrutinized individual facing the glare of Congress and the media. In the late-80s cultural atmosphere, when televised hearings turned politics into daytime drama, that framing mattered. It offered viewers an easy channel for sympathy: whatever he did, he deserves fair treatment. The appeal is less about North than about the listener's self-image. "The same rights as you yourself do, sir" is a direct conscription of the questioner into her argument. If you deny him, you're denying yourself.
There's a quiet populism here, too: citizenship as the ultimate equalizer, even when the citizen in question operated within a national-security machine built on secrecy and hierarchy. Hall's intent isn't to exonerate so much as to relocate the debate from actions to process, from accountability to perceived fairness. It's a savvy reframing, and in a scandal defined by blurred lines, reframing was half the battle.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Fawn
Add to List
